| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 |
| 92 | 25 | 28 | 15 | 24 |
Virtus Bologna (Cyber) 61:92 Olympiacos (Cyber) — Match Result
Questions & Answers
Who won the Virtus Bologna (Cyber) vs Olympiacos (Cyber) game?
Olympiacos (Cyber) won 92-61.
What was the final score of Virtus Bologna (Cyber) vs Olympiacos (Cyber)?
Virtus Bologna (Cyber) 61 : 92 Olympiacos (Cyber).
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Virtus Bologna (Cyber) vs Olympiacos (Cyber)?
By quarter: 21:25, 18:28, 8:15, 14:24.
Where people bet the most today
$22.9K
Betting volume434
bets- Tasmania JackJumpers — Brisbane BulletsOver 186.5 points · 57 bets→$8.6K160 bets
- Ryukyu Golden Kings — Altiri ChibaRyukyu Golden Kings to win · 32 bets→$3.1K38 bets
- Hapoel Tel-Aviv — Virtus Segafredo BolognaHandicap Virtus Segafredo Bologna (+8.5) · 24 bets→$3.1K63 bets
- Utstunomiya Brex — Nagoya Diamond DolphinsUtstunomiya Brex to win · 29 bets→$2.8K43 bets
- Chiba Jets Funabashi — Kyoto HannaryzKyoto Hannaryz to win · 13 bets→$1.5K20 bets
- Levanga Hokkaido — Toyama GrousesToyama Grouses to win · 14 bets→$1.4K26 bets
- Saga Ballooners — Nagasaki VelcaSaga Ballooners to win · 22 bets→$68327 bets
- Shinshu Brave Warriors — Sunrockers Shibuya→$50419 bets
- Kawasaki Brave Thunders — Osaka EvessaKawasaki Brave Thunders to win · 11 bets→$49414 bets
- Shiga Lake Stars — Nishinomiya StorksShiga Lake Stars to win · 9 bets→$45511 bets
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 0 | 0 |
Points | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |
Euroleague: regular season 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | WWW | |
| 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | WWWL | |
| 5 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | LWWW | |
| 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | WLWW | |
| 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | WWWL | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | WLWW | |
| 9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | WLLW | |
| 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | WLWW | |
| 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLWW | |
| 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLWL | |
| 13 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | LWWL | |
| 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LWL | |
| 15 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | LLWL | |
| 16 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLLW | |
| 17 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLLL | |
| 18 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | LLLL | |
| 19 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | LLLL | |
| 20 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | LLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | +120 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 5 | +59 | 100.0% | |
| 3 | 3 | +35 | 100.0% | |
| 4 | 6 | +89 | 83.3% | |
| 5 | 6 | +116 | 83.3% | |
| 6 | 4 | +36 | 75.0% | |
| 7 | 4 | +30 | 75.0% | |
| 8 | 6 | +85 | 66.7% | |
| 9 | 5 | +49 | 60.0% | |
| 10 | 5 | +32 | 60.0% | |
| 11 | 6 | +59 | 50.0% | |
| 12 | 6 | -8 | 50.0% | |
| 13 | 5 | -31 | 40.0% | |
| 14 | 3 | -35 | 33.3% | |
| 15 | 4 | -1 | 25.0% | |
| 16 | 6 | -78 | 16.7% | |
| 17 | 6 | -106 | 16.7% | |
| 18 | 6 | -90 | 0.0% | |
| 19 | 6 | -146 | 0.0% | |
| 20 | 6 | -215 | 0.0% |