Vilniaus Rytas vs Trabzonspor BK Basketball Live Score & Lineups
Questions & Answers
Who is the favourite in Vilniaus Rytas vs Trabzonspor BK?
CheckLive favours Vilniaus Rytas. Model signal strength: 76/100.
When is Vilniaus Rytas vs Trabzonspor BK?
28 October 2026 at 17:30 UK time
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Where people bet the most today
$170.7K
Betting volume2.5K
bets- Cleveland Cavaliers — Minnesota TimberwolvesMinnesota Timberwolves to win · 632 bets→$60.6K962 bets
- Charlotte Hornets — Washington WizardsWashington Wizards to win · 188 bets→$51.8K625 bets
- Boston Celtics — Chicago BullsBoston Celtics to win · 137 bets→$32.8K471 bets
- Miami Heat — Dallas MavericksMiami Heat to win · 122 bets→$24K370 bets
- Nagasaki Velca — Ryukyu Golden KingsRyukyu Golden Kings to win · 9 bets→$8669 bets
- Yokohama B Corsairs — Hiroshima DragonfliesHiroshima Dragonflies to win · 10 bets→$43819 bets
- Shimane Susanoo Magic — Sendai 89ersShimane Susanoo Magic to win · 4 bets→$1435 bets
- Altiri Chiba — Gunma Crane ThundersGunma Crane Thunders to win · 5 bets→$205 bets
◆ CheckLive verdict
Clear favorite — Vilniaus Rytas
Vilniaus Rytas is a strong favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 71.2 + 2.8 for home advantage = 74 vs 53.3 for Trabzonspor BK. The biggest edge is in recent form (CheckForm 72 vs 43). CheckLive signal strength 76/100.
Home win — Vilniaus Rytas
High confidence76%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
72
43
CheckSkill
80
64
CheckMental
50
47
CheckLive total74 vs 53.3+20.7Vilniaus Rytas: 71.2 + 2.8 for home advantage = 74
More match signals
Over 170.567%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Vilniaus Rytas vs Trabzonspor BK?
In the CheckLive calculation Vilniaus Rytas is the favourite: 71.2 + 2.8 for home advantage = 74 vs 53.3. Signal strength 76/100; it is not a win probability.
What is Vilniaus Rytas's main edge?
Vilniaus Rytas is strongest in recent form: CheckForm 72 vs 43 for Trabzonspor BK. The overall rating gap is 20.7.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
Group A
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW | |
| 2 | Nanterre 92 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
| 3 | Vilniaus Rytas | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LL |
Group B
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIG Strasbourg | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 2 | KK Cibona | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 3 | Galatasaray | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
| 4 | Legia Warszawa | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
Group C
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telenet Antwerp Giants | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 2 | Falco KC-Szombathely | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
| 3 | AEK Athens BC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 4 | Salon Vilpas Vikings | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | WWLL |
Group D
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UCAM Murcia | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 2 | Peristeri BC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 3 | Brose Bamberg | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LL |
| 4 | Openjobmetis Varese | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LL |
Group E
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unicaja Málaga | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 2 | Utenos Juventus | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
| 3 | UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 4 | BK JIP Pardubice | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LL |
Group F
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cholet Basket | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 2 | Hapoel Unet Holon | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
| 3 | KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 4 | Rasta Vechta | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | WWLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | +27 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | Nanterre 92 | 2 | +18 | 50.0% |
| 3 | Vilniaus Rytas | 2 | -19 | 50.0% |
| 4 | 2 | -26 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIG Strasbourg | 2 | +32 | 50.0% |
| 2 | KK Cibona | 2 | +2 | 50.0% |
| 3 | Galatasaray | 2 | -14 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Legia Warszawa | 2 | -20 | 50.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telenet Antwerp Giants | 2 | +33 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Falco KC-Szombathely | 2 | +7 | 50.0% |
| 3 | AEK Athens BC | 2 | -25 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Salon Vilpas Vikings | 2 | -15 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UCAM Murcia | 2 | +46 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Peristeri BC | 2 | +9 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Brose Bamberg | 2 | -25 | 0.0% |
| 4 | Openjobmetis Varese | 2 | -30 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unicaja Málaga | 2 | +52 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Utenos Juventus | 2 | -35 | 50.0% |
| 3 | UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 2 | +16 | 50.0% |
| 4 | BK JIP Pardubice | 2 | -33 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cholet Basket | 2 | +38 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Hapoel Unet Holon | 2 | -18 | 50.0% |
| 3 | KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 2 | +30 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Rasta Vechta | 2 | -50 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alba Berlin | 2 | +35 | 100.0% |
| 2 | RETABet Bilbao Basket | 2 | +24 | 100.0% |
| 3 | KK Igokea Aleksandrovac mtl | 2 | -24 | 0.0% |
| 4 | SK Slavia Praha | 2 | -35 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Club Joventut de Badalona | 2 | +13 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Telekom Baskets Bonn | 2 | +2 | 50.0% |
| 3 | Porto | 2 | +8 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Bnei Herzeliya | 2 | -23 | 0.0% |





























