| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q | Over time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98 | 21 | 19 | 35 | 14 | 9 |
| 95 | 21 | 25 | 23 | 20 | 6 |
Utenos Juventus 98:95 BK JIP Pardubice — Match Result
Questions & Answers
Who won the Utenos Juventus vs BK JIP Pardubice game?
Utenos Juventus won 98-95.
What was the final score of Utenos Juventus vs BK JIP Pardubice?
Utenos Juventus 98 : 95 BK JIP Pardubice.
Who scored the most points in Utenos Juventus vs BK JIP Pardubice?
Trey Bonham led all scorers with 27 points.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Utenos Juventus vs BK JIP Pardubice?
By quarter: 21:21, 19:25, 35:23, 14:20, OT 9:6.
Match betting activity
$349
Betting volume17
bets- Utenos Juventus to winWon · 41.2% of bets$2737 bets
- BK JIP Pardubice to winLost · 58.8% of bets$7610 bets
CheckLive betting analytics uses CheckLive’s internal calculation model. Figures describe activity over the selected period, not unique people or bet slips. Coverage may be partial. How to read betting activity: interactive guide
No data
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — BK JIP Pardubice
BK JIP Pardubice is a slight favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 64.2 vs 59.2 for Utenos Juventus. The biggest edge is in overall quality (CheckSkill 78 vs 64). CheckLive signal strength 57/100.
Over 165.51.83
Low confidence59%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
56
58
CheckSkill
64
78
CheckMental
40
44
CheckLive total59.2 vs 64.2+5.0
More match signals
Away win — BK JIP Pardubice60%3.45
Today's market odds.
Bets and model
Full matchCollecting data
Bets appear when the interval has been checked.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Utenos Juventus vs BK JIP Pardubice?
In the CheckLive calculation BK JIP Pardubice is the favourite: 64.2 vs 59.2. Signal strength 57/100; it is not a win probability.
What is BK JIP Pardubice's main edge?
BK JIP Pardubice is strongest in overall quality: CheckSkill 78 vs 64 for Utenos Juventus. The overall rating gap is 5.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
Statistics
62%
Free throws
87%
56%
2 pointers
57%
34%
3 pointers
36%
49%
Field goals
46%
49
Rebounds
29
30
Defensive rebounds
22
19
Offensive rebounds
7
27
Assists
16
23
Turnovers
21
12
Steals
12
2
Blocks
3
26
Fouls
28
10
Max points in a row
18
28:40
Time spent in lead
9:59
13
Biggest lead
9
Group A
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Vilniaus Rytas | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 2 |  Trabzonspor BK | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 3 | Sabah | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LLW |
| 4 |  Nanterre 92 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LWL |
Group B
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  SIG Strasbourg | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 2 |  Legia Warszawa | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | LWW |
| 3 |  KK Cibona | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | WLL |
| 4 |  Galatasaray | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LWL |
Group C
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Telenet Antwerp Giants | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 2 |  AEK Athens BC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 3 |  Falco KC-Szombathely | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LWL |
| 4 |  Salon Vilpas Vikings | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | WLLW |
Group D
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Peristeri BC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | WWW |
| 2 |  UCAM Murcia | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 3 |  Openjobmetis Varese | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LLW |
| 4 |  Brose Bamberg | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | LLL |
Group E
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Unicaja Málaga | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | WWW |
| 2 |  Utenos Juventus | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | LWW |
| 3 |  UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | WLL |
| 4 |  BK JIP Pardubice | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | LLL |
Group F
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Cholet Basket | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 2 |  KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 3 |  Hapoel Unet Holon | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | LWW |
| 4 |  Rasta Vechta | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | WLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vilniaus Rytas | 3 | -3 | 66.7% |
| 2 | Trabzonspor BK | 3 | +11 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Sabah | 3 | -19 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Nanterre 92 | 3 | +11 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIG Strasbourg | 3 | +57 | 66.7% |
| 2 | Legia Warszawa | 3 | -13 | 66.7% |
| 3 | KK Cibona | 3 | -23 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Galatasaray | 3 | -21 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telenet Antwerp Giants | 3 | +25 | 66.7% |
| 2 | AEK Athens BC | 3 | -19 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Falco KC-Szombathely | 3 | +1 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Salon Vilpas Vikings | 3 | -7 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peristeri BC | 3 | +17 | 100.0% |
| 2 | UCAM Murcia | 3 | +38 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Openjobmetis Varese | 3 | +4 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Brose Bamberg | 3 | -59 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unicaja Málaga | 3 | +57 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Utenos Juventus | 3 | -32 | 66.7% |
| 3 | UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 3 | +11 | 33.3% |
| 4 | BK JIP Pardubice | 3 | -36 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cholet Basket | 3 | +34 | 66.7% |
| 2 | KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 3 | +34 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Hapoel Unet Holon | 3 | -11 | 66.7% |
| 4 | Rasta Vechta | 3 | -57 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Alba Berlin | 3 | +38 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  RETABet Bilbao Basket | 3 | +21 | 66.7% |
| 3 |  KK Igokea Aleksandrovac mtl | 3 | -19 | 33.3% |
| 4 |  SK Slavia Praha | 3 | -40 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Club Joventut de Badalona | 3 | +30 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  Telekom Baskets Bonn | 3 | +14 | 66.7% |
| 3 |  Porto | 3 | -9 | 33.3% |
| 4 |  Bnei Herzeliya | 3 | -35 | 0.0% |
Odds
| 1 | 2 |
|---|---|
| 1.27 | 3.45 |