Vilniaus Rytas vs Nanterre 92 Basketball Live Score & Lineups
Questions & Answers
Who is the favourite in Vilniaus Rytas vs Nanterre 92?
CheckLive favours Vilniaus Rytas. Model signal strength: 56/100.
When is Vilniaus Rytas vs Nanterre 92?
11 November 2026 at 17:30 UK time
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Where people bet the most today
$10.9K
Betting volume386
bets- Pınar Karşıyaka — Beşiktaş Icrypex→$5K238 bets
- Shimane Susanoo Magic — Toyama GrousesShimane Susanoo Magic to win · 21 bets→$2.3K32 bets
- Ibaraki Robots — Ryukyu Golden KingsIbaraki Robots to win · 19 bets→$80034 bets
- Gunma Crane Thunders — Nagoya Diamond DolphinsNagoya Diamond Dolphins to win · 9 bets→$73911 bets
- Kyoto Hannaryz — Levanga HokkaidoLevanga Hokkaido to win · 12 bets→$63817 bets
- Medipolis SC Jena — Hamburg TowersHamburg Towers to win · 3 bets→$5125 bets
- Nagasaki Velca — Sendai 89ersSendai 89ers to win · 14 bets→$40619 bets
- Kawasaki Brave Thunders — Altiri ChibaKawasaki Brave Thunders to win · 10 bets→$26917 bets
- Virtus Segafredo Bologna — Tezenis Verona→$15812 bets
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 0 |
Points | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Vilniaus Rytas
Vilniaus Rytas is a slight favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 72.8 vs 68.7 for Nanterre 92. The biggest edge is in recent form (CheckForm 68 vs 65). CheckLive signal strength 56/100.
Under 172
Low confidence43%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
68
65
CheckSkill
79
79
CheckMental
53
52
CheckLive total72.8 vs 68.7+4.1
More match signals
Home win — Vilniaus Rytas50%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Vilniaus Rytas vs Nanterre 92?
In the CheckLive calculation Vilniaus Rytas is the favourite: 72.8 vs 68.7. Signal strength 56/100; it is not a win probability.
What is Vilniaus Rytas's main edge?
Vilniaus Rytas is strongest in recent form: CheckForm 68 vs 65 for Nanterre 92. The overall rating gap is 4.1.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
Group A
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Vilniaus Rytas | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 2 | Trabzonspor BK | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 3 | Sabah | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LLW |
| 4 |  Nanterre 92 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LWL |
Group B
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  SIG Strasbourg | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 2 |  Legia Warszawa | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | LWW |
| 3 |  KK Cibona | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | WLL |
| 4 |  Galatasaray | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LWL |
Group C
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Telenet Antwerp Giants | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 2 |  AEK Athens BC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 3 |  Falco KC-Szombathely | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LWL |
| 4 |  Salon Vilpas Vikings | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | WLLW |
Group D
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Peristeri BC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | WWW |
| 2 |  UCAM Murcia | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 3 |  Openjobmetis Varese | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LLW |
| 4 |  Brose Bamberg | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | LLL |
Group E
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Unicaja Málaga | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | WWW |
| 2 |  Utenos Juventus | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | LWW |
| 3 |  UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | WLL |
| 4 |  BK JIP Pardubice | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | LLL |
Group F
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Cholet Basket | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WWL |
| 2 |  KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | WLW |
| 3 |  Hapoel Unet Holon | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | LWW |
| 4 |  Rasta Vechta | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | WLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vilniaus Rytas | 3 | -3 | 66.7% |
| 2 | Trabzonspor BK | 3 | +11 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Sabah | 3 | -19 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Nanterre 92 | 3 | +11 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIG Strasbourg | 3 | +57 | 66.7% |
| 2 | Legia Warszawa | 3 | -13 | 66.7% |
| 3 | KK Cibona | 3 | -23 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Galatasaray | 3 | -21 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telenet Antwerp Giants | 3 | +25 | 66.7% |
| 2 | AEK Athens BC | 3 | -19 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Falco KC-Szombathely | 3 | +1 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Salon Vilpas Vikings | 3 | -7 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peristeri BC | 3 | +17 | 100.0% |
| 2 | UCAM Murcia | 3 | +38 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Openjobmetis Varese | 3 | +4 | 33.3% |
| 4 | Brose Bamberg | 3 | -59 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unicaja Málaga | 3 | +57 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Utenos Juventus | 3 | -32 | 66.7% |
| 3 | UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 3 | +11 | 33.3% |
| 4 | BK JIP Pardubice | 3 | -36 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cholet Basket | 3 | +34 | 66.7% |
| 2 | KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 3 | +34 | 66.7% |
| 3 | Hapoel Unet Holon | 3 | -11 | 66.7% |
| 4 | Rasta Vechta | 3 | -57 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Alba Berlin | 3 | +38 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  RETABet Bilbao Basket | 3 | +21 | 66.7% |
| 3 |  KK Igokea Aleksandrovac mtl | 3 | -19 | 33.3% |
| 4 |  SK Slavia Praha | 3 | -40 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Club Joventut de Badalona | 3 | +30 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  Telekom Baskets Bonn | 3 | +14 | 66.7% |
| 3 |  Porto | 3 | -9 | 33.3% |
| 4 |  Bnei Herzeliya | 3 | -35 | 0.0% |
Vilniaus Rytas
- 5Matches
- 452Goals
- 90.4Goal per game
- 3Wins
- 0Draws
- 2Losses
Nanterre 92
- 5Matches
- 425Goals
- 85Goal per game
- 3Wins
- 0Draws
- 2Losses
