KK Cibona vs Legia Warszawa Basketball Live Score & Lineups
Questions & Answers
Who is the favourite in KK Cibona vs Legia Warszawa?
CheckLive favours Legia Warszawa. Model signal strength: 58/100.
When is KK Cibona vs Legia Warszawa?
20 October 2026 at 19:00 UK time
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Where people bet the most today
$16.7K
Betting volume497
bets- Melbourne United — Illawarra HawksLIVE · Melbourne United to win · 81 bets→$11.6K290 bets
- GeVi Napoli Basket — EA7 Emporio Armani MilanoEA7 Emporio Armani Milano to win · 16 bets→$2.1K26 bets
- Ibaraki Robots — Osaka EvessaLIVE · Ibaraki Robots to win · 21 bets→$1.2K73 bets
- Yokohama B Corsairs — Levanga HokkaidoLIVE · Levanga Hokkaido to win · 4 bets→$1.2K54 bets
- Beşiktaş Icrypex — GalatasarayBeşiktaş Icrypex to win · 12 bets→$39622 bets
- Real Madrid — RETABet Bilbao BasketReal Madrid to win · 2 bets→$936 bets
- Pallacanestro Trieste — Pallacanestro CantùPallacanestro Trieste to win · 5 bets→$458 bets
- Valencia Basket — UCAM MurciaUCAM Murcia to win · 4 bets→$398 bets
- Club Joventut de Badalona — Barça BasketClub Joventut de Badalona to win · 3 bets→$215 bets
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Legia Warszawa
Legia Warszawa is the favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 71.4 vs 63.2 for KK Cibona. The biggest edge is in recent form (CheckForm 69 vs 59). CheckLive signal strength 58/100.
Under 163.5
Medium confidence58%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
59
69
CheckSkill
75
81
CheckMental
44
54
CheckLive total63.2 vs 71.4+8.2
More match signals
Away win — Legia Warszawa59%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in KK Cibona vs Legia Warszawa?
On CheckLive metrics Legia Warszawa rate higher: 71.4 vs 63.2, CheckLive signal strength 58/100.
What is Legia Warszawa's main edge?
Legia Warszawa is strongest in recent form: CheckForm 69 vs 59 for KK Cibona. The overall rating gap is 8.2.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
Group A
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Trabzonspor BK | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 2 |  Nanterre 92 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
| 3 |  Vilniaus Rytas | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 4 | Sabah | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LL |
Group B
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  SIG Strasbourg | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W |
| 2 |  KK Cibona | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W |
| 3 |  Galatasaray | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | L |
| 4 |  Legia Warszawa | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | L |
Group C
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Telenet Antwerp Giants | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W |
| 2 |  AEK Athens BC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W |
| 3 |  Salon Vilpas Vikings | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | WWWL |
| 4 |  Falco KC-Szombathely | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | L |
Group D
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  UCAM Murcia | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 2 |  Peristeri BC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 3 |  Brose Bamberg | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LL |
| 4 |  Openjobmetis Varese | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LL |
Group E
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Unicaja Málaga | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W |
| 2 |  UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W |
| 3 |  BK JIP Pardubice | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | L |
| 4 |  Utenos Juventus | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | L |
Group F
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Cholet Basket | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW |
| 2 |  Hapoel Unet Holon | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW |
| 3 |  KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WL |
| 4 |  Rasta Vechta | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | WWLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trabzonspor BK | 2 | +27 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Nanterre 92 | 2 | +18 | 50.0% |
| 3 | Vilniaus Rytas | 2 | -19 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Sabah | 2 | -26 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIG Strasbourg | 1 | +38 | 100.0% |
| 2 | KK Cibona | 1 | +20 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Galatasaray | 1 | -20 | 0.0% |
| 4 | Legia Warszawa | 1 | -38 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telenet Antwerp Giants | 1 | +6 | 100.0% |
| 2 | AEK Athens BC | 1 | +2 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Salon Vilpas Vikings | 1 | -2 | 0.0% |
| 4 | Falco KC-Szombathely | 1 | -6 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UCAM Murcia | 2 | +46 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Peristeri BC | 2 | +9 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Brose Bamberg | 2 | -25 | 0.0% |
| 4 | Openjobmetis Varese | 2 | -30 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unicaja Málaga | 1 | +36 | 100.0% |
| 2 | UNAhotels Reggio Emilia | 1 | +17 | 100.0% |
| 3 | BK JIP Pardubice | 1 | -17 | 0.0% |
| 4 | Utenos Juventus | 1 | -36 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cholet Basket | 2 | +38 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Hapoel Unet Holon | 2 | -18 | 50.0% |
| 3 | KK Spartak Office Shoes Subotica | 2 | +30 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Rasta Vechta | 2 | -50 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Alba Berlin | 2 | +35 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  RETABet Bilbao Basket | 2 | +24 | 100.0% |
| 3 |  KK Igokea Aleksandrovac mtl | 2 | -24 | 0.0% |
| 4 |  SK Slavia Praha | 2 | -35 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Club Joventut de Badalona | 1 | +11 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  Telekom Baskets Bonn | 1 | +4 | 100.0% |
| 3 |  Porto | 1 | -4 | 0.0% |
| 4 |  Bnei Herzeliya | 1 | -11 | 0.0% |