Hereda San Pablo Burgos vs Rigas Zelli Basketball Live Score & Lineups
Questions & Answers
Who is the favourite in Hereda San Pablo Burgos vs Rigas Zelli?
CheckLive favours Rigas Zelli. Model signal strength: 59/100.
When is Hereda San Pablo Burgos vs Rigas Zelli?
28 October 2026 at 19:30 UK time
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Where people bet the most today
$3.4M
Betting volume16.2K
bets- Philadelphia 76ers — Detroit PistonsLIVE · Philadelphia 76ers to win · 1,233 bets→$1.5M6,651 bets
- Sacramento Kings — Memphis GrizzliesLIVE · Memphis Grizzlies to win · 318 bets→$1.1M3,045 bets
- New York Knicks — Orlando MagicLIVE · New York Knicks to win · 1,241 bets→$733.5K5,482 bets
- Charlotte Hornets — Washington WizardsWashington Wizards to win · 105 bets→$16.4K280 bets
- Cleveland Cavaliers — Minnesota TimberwolvesMinnesota Timberwolves to win · 172 bets→$12K311 bets
- Boston Celtics — Chicago BullsChicago Bulls to win · 81 bets→$9.7K264 bets
- Miami Heat — Dallas MavericksMiami Heat to win · 91 bets→$8.9K162 bets
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Rigas Zelli
Rigas Zelli is the favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 69.8 vs 60.2 + 2.8 for home advantage = 63 for Hereda San Pablo Burgos. The biggest edge is in overall quality (CheckSkill 84 vs 71). CheckLive signal strength 59/100.
Under 177
Medium confidence59%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
55
64
CheckSkill
71
84
CheckMental
45
48
CheckLive total63 vs 69.8+6.8Hereda San Pablo Burgos: 60.2 + 2.8 for home advantage = 63
More match signals
Away win — Rigas Zelli60%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Hereda San Pablo Burgos vs Rigas Zelli?
In the CheckLive calculation Rigas Zelli is the favourite: 69.8 vs 60.2 + 2.8 for home advantage = 63. Signal strength 59/100; it is not a win probability.
What is Rigas Zelli's main edge?
Rigas Zelli is strongest in overall quality: CheckSkill 84 vs 71 for Hereda San Pablo Burgos. The overall rating gap is 6.8.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
Eurocup 26/27, Group A
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Aris BC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW |
| 2 |  Hapoel Jerusalem BC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW |
| 3 |  Le Mans Basket | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | LLWW |
| 4 |  Bertram Yachts Derthona Tortona | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | LWLW |
| 5 |  Rigas Zelli | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | WLWL |
| 6 |  Hereda San Pablo Burgos | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | WLLL |
| 7 |  Rostock Seawolves | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | LWLL |
| 8 |  KK Cedevita Olimpija | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | LLLL |
Eurocup 26/27, Group B
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Lenovo Tenerife | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | WLWW |
| 2 |  Umana Reyer Venezia | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | WLWL |
| 3 |  London Lions | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | LWLW |
| 4 | Maxima Roma | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | WLLW |
| 5 |  Šiaulių Šiauliai | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | WLLW |
| 6 |  U-Banca Transilvania Cluj-Napoca | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | LWWL |
| 7 |  Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | LWWL |
| 8 |  Türk Telekom B.K. | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | LWLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aris BC | 4 | +77 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Hapoel Jerusalem BC | 4 | +69 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Le Mans Basket | 4 | +11 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Bertram Yachts Derthona Tortona | 4 | -6 | 50.0% |
| 5 | Rigas Zelli | 4 | -25 | 50.0% |
| 6 | Hereda San Pablo Burgos | 4 | -20 | 25.0% |
| 7 | Rostock Seawolves | 4 | -63 | 25.0% |
| 8 | KK Cedevita Olimpija | 4 | -43 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lenovo Tenerife | 4 | +30 | 75.0% |
| 2 | Umana Reyer Venezia | 4 | +25 | 50.0% |
| 3 | London Lions | 4 | +21 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Maxima Roma | 4 | +5 | 50.0% |
| 5 | Šiaulių Šiauliai | 4 | -14 | 50.0% |
| 6 | U-Banca Transilvania Cluj-Napoca | 4 | -26 | 50.0% |
| 7 | Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt | 4 | -29 | 50.0% |
| 8 | Türk Telekom B.K. | 4 | -12 | 25.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  GeVi Napoli Basket | 4 | +30 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  Tofaş Bursa | 4 | +25 | 75.0% |
| 3 |  BV Chemnitz 99 | 4 | +32 | 75.0% |
| 4 |  KK Budućnost VOLI | 4 | +16 | 50.0% |
| 5 |  JL Bourg Basket | 4 | -8 | 25.0% |
| 6 |  Klaipėdos Neptūnas | 4 | -23 | 25.0% |
| 7 |  Dolomiti Energia Trento | 4 | -29 | 25.0% |
| 8 |  Śląsk Wrocław | 4 | -43 | 25.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Bahçeşehir Koleji | 4 | +57 | 75.0% |
| 2 |  PAOK BC | 4 | +18 | 75.0% |
| 3 |  Panevėžio Lietkabelis | 4 | +14 | 75.0% |
| 4 |  BAXI Manresa | 4 | +5 | 50.0% |
| 5 |  Ratiopharm Ulm | 4 | +2 | 50.0% |
| 6 | BC Roma Spqr | 4 | -28 | 50.0% |
| 8 |  Balkan Botevgrad | 4 | -62 | 0.0% |