Rostock Seawolves vs KK Cedevita Olimpija Basketball Live Score & Lineups
Questions & Answers
Who is the favourite in Rostock Seawolves vs KK Cedevita Olimpija?
CheckLive favours Rostock Seawolves. Model signal strength: 54/100.
When is Rostock Seawolves vs KK Cedevita Olimpija?
10 November 2026 at 19:00 UK time
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Where people bet the most today
$130.3K
Betting volume2.3K
bets- Detroit Pistons — Los Angeles LakersLos Angeles Lakers to win · 465 bets→$68.5K1,040 bets
- Chicago Bulls — Philadelphia 76ersPhiladelphia 76ers to win · 482 bets→$49.8K895 bets
- CSKA Moscow — Zenit St. PetersburgLIVE · CSKA Moscow to win · 8 bets→$5.1K202 bets
- Anadolu Efes — Tofaş BursaLIVE · Anadolu Efes to win · 12 bets→$2.4K39 bets
- Lenovo Tenerife — Club Joventut de BadalonaLIVE · Lenovo Tenerife to win · 12 bets→$2.3K31 bets
- Kėdainių Nevėžis — Šiaulių ŠiauliaiŠiaulių Šiauliai to win · 4 bets→$1.2K9 bets
- Mitteldeutscher BC — Fraport Skyliners FrankfurtFraport Skyliners Frankfurt to win · 5 bets→$42014 bets
- EA7 Emporio Armani Milano — Dolomiti Energia TrentoEA7 Emporio Armani Milano to win · 4 bets→$1525 bets
- Galatasaray — Esenler EroksporHandicap Galatasaray (-5.5) · 3 bets→$1096 bets
- Real Madrid — UCAM MurciaReal Madrid to win · 5 bets→$76 bets
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Rostock Seawolves
Rostock Seawolves is a slight favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 64.9 vs 61.9 for KK Cedevita Olimpija. The biggest edge is in recent form (CheckForm 58 vs 56). CheckLive signal strength 54/100.
Under 161
Low confidence43%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
58
56
CheckSkill
75
77
CheckMental
40
38
CheckLive total64.9 vs 61.9+3.0
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Rostock Seawolves vs KK Cedevita Olimpija?
In the CheckLive calculation Rostock Seawolves is the favourite: 64.9 vs 61.9. Signal strength 54/100; it is not a win probability.
What is Rostock Seawolves's main edge?
Rostock Seawolves is strongest in recent form: CheckForm 58 vs 56 for KK Cedevita Olimpija. The overall rating gap is 3.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
Eurocup 26/27, Group A
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Hapoel Jerusalem BC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW |
| 2 |  Aris BC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | WWWL |
| 3 |  Bertram Yachts Derthona Tortona | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LWWL |
| 4 |  Le Mans Basket | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WWLW |
| 5 |  Rigas Zelli | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLWL |
| 6 |  Rostock Seawolves | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LLLW |
| 7 |  Hereda San Pablo Burgos | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLLL |
| 8 |  KK Cedevita Olimpija | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLLW |
Eurocup 26/27, Group B
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Lenovo Tenerife | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | WWWW |
| 2 |  Umana Reyer Venezia | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLLW |
| 3 |  London Lions | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LWWL |
| 4 | Maxima Roma | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LWLW |
| 5 |  Šiaulių Šiauliai | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LWWL |
| 6 |  Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLWL |
| 7 |  Türk Telekom B.K. | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LLLW |
| 8 |  U-Banca Transilvania Cluj-Napoca | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | WLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hapoel Jerusalem BC | 6 | +87 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Aris BC | 6 | +71 | 83.3% |
| 3 | Bertram Yachts Derthona Tortona | 6 | -3 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Le Mans Basket | 6 | +10 | 50.0% |
| 5 | Rigas Zelli | 6 | -23 | 50.0% |
| 6 | Rostock Seawolves | 6 | -39 | 33.3% |
| 7 | Hereda San Pablo Burgos | 6 | -55 | 16.7% |
| 8 | KK Cedevita Olimpija | 6 | -48 | 16.7% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lenovo Tenerife | 6 | +72 | 83.3% |
| 2 | Umana Reyer Venezia | 6 | +44 | 50.0% |
| 3 | London Lions | 6 | +39 | 50.0% |
| 4 | Maxima Roma | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| 5 | Šiaulių Šiauliai | 6 | -30 | 50.0% |
| 6 | Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt | 6 | -33 | 50.0% |
| 7 | Türk Telekom B.K. | 6 | -10 | 33.3% |
| 8 | U-Banca Transilvania Cluj-Napoca | 6 | -82 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  GeVi Napoli Basket | 6 | +50 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  Tofaş Bursa | 6 | +56 | 83.3% |
| 3 |  BV Chemnitz 99 | 6 | +39 | 66.7% |
| 4 |  KK Budućnost VOLI | 6 | +26 | 50.0% |
| 5 |  JL Bourg Basket | 6 | -23 | 33.3% |
| 6 |  Dolomiti Energia Trento | 6 | -38 | 33.3% |
| 7 |  Klaipėdos Neptūnas | 6 | -47 | 16.7% |
| 8 |  Śląsk Wrocław | 6 | -63 | 16.7% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Bahçeşehir Koleji | 6 | +74 | 83.3% |
| 2 |  PAOK BC | 6 | +17 | 66.7% |
| 3 |  BAXI Manresa | 6 | +30 | 66.7% |
| 4 |  Ratiopharm Ulm | 6 | +6 | 50.0% |
| 5 |  Panevėžio Lietkabelis | 6 | -18 | 50.0% |
| 7 | BC Roma Spqr | 6 | -35 | 33.3% |
| 8 |  Balkan Botevgrad | 6 | -64 | 16.7% |