Maxima Roma vs London Lions Basketball Live Score & Lineups
Questions & Answers
Who is the favourite in Maxima Roma vs London Lions?
CheckLive favours London Lions. Model signal strength: 83/100.
When is Maxima Roma vs London Lions?
4 November 2026 at 19:30 UK time
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Where people bet the most today
$60.4K
Betting volume1.1K
bets- Orlando Magic — Boston CelticsBoston Celtics to win · 149 bets→$19.2K364 bets
- South East Melbourne Phoenix — Tasmania JackJumpersLIVE · Tasmania JackJumpers to win · 114 bets→$17.6K287 bets
- Indiana Pacers — Brooklyn NetsIndiana Pacers to win · 74 bets→$14K233 bets
- Sendai 89ers — Sunrockers Shibuya→$3.8K39 bets
- Chiba Jets Funabashi — Toyama GrousesChiba Jets Funabashi to win · 14 bets→$2.4K28 bets
- Akita Northern Happinets — Altiri ChibaAkita Northern Happinets to win · 17 bets→$97531 bets
- Ibaraki Robots — Levanga HokkaidoLevanga Hokkaido to win · 16 bets→$51623 bets
- Shinshu Brave Warriors — Kyoto HannaryzKyoto Hannaryz to win · 14 bets→$36621 bets
- Adelaide 36ers — Brisbane BulletsHandicap Adelaide 36ers (-7.5) · 7 bets→$23821 bets
- Alvark Tokyo — Utstunomiya BrexAlvark Tokyo to win · 9 bets→$22612 bets
◆ CheckLive verdict
Clear favorite — London Lions
London Lions is a strong favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 77.7 vs 46.1 + 2.8 for home advantage = 48.9 for Maxima Roma. The biggest edge is in overall quality (CheckSkill 89 vs 47). CheckLive signal strength 83/100.
Away win — London Lions
High confidence83%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
46
75
CheckSkill
47
89
CheckMental
44
57
CheckLive total48.9 vs 77.7+28.8Maxima Roma: 46.1 + 2.8 for home advantage = 48.9
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Maxima Roma vs London Lions?
In the CheckLive calculation London Lions is the favourite: 77.7 vs 46.1 + 2.8 for home advantage = 48.9. Signal strength 83/100; it is not a win probability.
What is London Lions's main edge?
London Lions is strongest in overall quality: CheckSkill 89 vs 47 for Maxima Roma. The overall rating gap is 28.8.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
Eurocup 26/27, Group A
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Aris BC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW |
| 2 |  Hapoel Jerusalem BC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW |
| 3 |  Rigas Zelli | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | LWLW |
| 4 |  Bertram Yachts Derthona Tortona | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | WLWW |
| 5 |  Le Mans Basket | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | LWWL |
| 6 |  Hereda San Pablo Burgos | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | LLLL |
| 7 |  Rostock Seawolves | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | WLLL |
| 8 |  KK Cedevita Olimpija | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | LLLL |
Eurocup 26/27, Group B
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Lenovo Tenerife | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | LWWW |
| 2 |  Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | WWLW |
| 3 |  Šiaulių Šiauliai | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | LLWW |
| 4 |  London Lions | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | WLWW |
| 5 | Maxima Roma | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | LLWL |
| 6 |  U-Banca Transilvania Cluj-Napoca | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | WWLL |
| 7 |  Umana Reyer Venezia | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | LWLL |
| 8 |  Türk Telekom B.K. | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | WLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aris BC | 5 | +82 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Hapoel Jerusalem BC | 5 | +76 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Rigas Zelli | 5 | -17 | 60.0% |
| 4 | Bertram Yachts Derthona Tortona | 5 | -3 | 60.0% |
| 5 | Le Mans Basket | 5 | +4 | 40.0% |
| 6 | Hereda San Pablo Burgos | 5 | -28 | 20.0% |
| 7 | Rostock Seawolves | 5 | -66 | 20.0% |
| 8 | KK Cedevita Olimpija | 5 | -48 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lenovo Tenerife | 5 | +32 | 80.0% |
| 2 | Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt | 5 | -13 | 60.0% |
| 3 | Šiaulių Šiauliai | 5 | -9 | 60.0% |
| 4 | London Lions | 5 | +39 | 60.0% |
| 5 | Maxima Roma | 5 | 0 | 40.0% |
| 6 | U-Banca Transilvania Cluj-Napoca | 5 | -42 | 40.0% |
| 7 | Umana Reyer Venezia | 5 | +23 | 40.0% |
| 8 | Türk Telekom B.K. | 5 | -30 | 20.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  GeVi Napoli Basket | 5 | +39 | 100.0% |
| 2 |  Tofaş Bursa | 5 | +41 | 80.0% |
| 3 |  BV Chemnitz 99 | 5 | +51 | 80.0% |
| 4 |  Dolomiti Energia Trento | 5 | -27 | 40.0% |
| 5 |  KK Budućnost VOLI | 5 | +14 | 40.0% |
| 6 |  JL Bourg Basket | 5 | -27 | 20.0% |
| 7 |  Klaipėdos Neptūnas | 5 | -32 | 20.0% |
| 8 |  Śląsk Wrocław | 5 | -59 | 20.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Bahçeşehir Koleji | 5 | +60 | 80.0% |
| 2 |  Ratiopharm Ulm | 5 | +20 | 60.0% |
| 3 |  BAXI Manresa | 5 | +16 | 60.0% |
| 4 |  PAOK BC | 5 | +15 | 60.0% |
| 5 |  Panevėžio Lietkabelis | 5 | -4 | 60.0% |
| 7 | BC Roma Spqr | 5 | -33 | 40.0% |
| 8 |  Balkan Botevgrad | 5 | -73 | 0.0% |