Pato 0:2 Harma — Match Report
Where people bet the most today
$114.8K
Betting volume2.6K
bets- Internacional — CorinthiansUnder 2.5 goals · 257 bets→$59.6K1,160 bets
- Cruzeiro — São PauloCruzeiro to win · 58 bets→$23.5K376 bets
- CRB — Atlético GoianienseAtlético Goianiense: over 1.5 goals · 27 bets→$11.7K278 bets
- Operário-PR — Botafogo-SPDouble chance: X2 · 36 bets→$10.5K344 bets
- América Mineiro — FortalezaDouble chance: 1X · 25 bets→$4.1K147 bets
- Vila Nova — CuiabáCuiabá: over 1.5 goals · 22 bets→$3.5K153 bets
- Avaí — LondrinaLondrina: over 0.5 goals (1H) · 25 bets→$1.9K130 bets
Head to Head meetings
Pato – Harma
Pato
Harma
- 1
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 1
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  1 | 1  |
Scored goals | 4 | 4 |
Average per game | 2 | 2 |
The biggest victory | 4-2 | 0-2 |
Pato
Harma
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchThere is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Clear favorite — Pato
Pato is a slight favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 37.5 vs 35.1 for Harma. The biggest edge is in overall quality (CheckSkill 44.7 vs 40.8). CheckLive signal strength 61/100.
Home win — Pato
High confidence61%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
35.8
35
CheckSkill
44.7
40.8
CheckMental
24.4
22.4
CheckLive total37.5 vs 35.1+2.4
More match signals
BTTS 1H — Yes80%
Over 3.564%
Over 4.564%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Pato vs Harma?
On CheckLive metrics Pato rate higher: 37.5 vs 35.1, CheckLive signal strength 61/100.
What is Pato's main edge?
Pato is strongest in overall quality: CheckSkill 44.7 vs 40.8 for Harma. The overall rating gap is 2.4.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 2-1 (Pato vs Harma, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |