Musselburgh Athletic FC 0:4 Clydebank FC — Match Report
Where people bet the most today
$553.1K
Betting volume11K
bets- Real Salt Lake — San Jose EarthquakesLIVE · Under 0.5 goals (1H) · 62 bets→$215.1K1,598 bets
- Colorado Rapids — Minnesota United FCLIVE · Double chance: X2 · 106 bets→$50K1,069 bets
- Los Angeles FC — Austin FCLIVE · Double chance: X2 · 41 bets→$49.8K933 bets
- LD Alajuelense — HeredianoLIVE · Over 1.5 goals · 45 bets→$37K441 bets
- San Diego FC — Houston DynamoLIVE · Double chance: X2 · 28 bets→$35.9K538 bets
- LA Galaxy — Portland TimbersLIVE · Double chance: X2 · 53 bets→$25.8K757 bets
- Brighton & Hove Albion — FK Kauno ŽalgirisOver 4.5 goals · 99 bets→$13.5K409 bets
- Torreense — SunderlandSunderland to win · 38 bets→$10.8K189 bets
- Panathinaikos — FK Borac Banja LukaFK Borac Banja Luka handicap +2.5 · 380 bets→$10.6K703 bets
- Benfica — CelticBenfica to win · 48 bets→$8.2K220 bets
Head to Head meetings
Musselburgh Athletic FC – Clydebank FC
Musselburgh Athletic FC
Clydebank FC
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 1
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 1  |
Scored goals | 0 | 4 |
Average per game | 0 | 4 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0-4 |
Musselburgh Athletic FC
Clydebank FC
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchThere is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Clydebank FC
Clydebank FC is a slight favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 58.9 vs 57.1 for Musselburgh Athletic FC. The biggest edge is in recent form (CheckForm 58.7 vs 56.3). CheckLive signal strength 56/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards Musselburgh Athletic FC, so the edge is thin.
Over 3.5
Medium confidence56%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
56.3
58.7
CheckSkill
51.5
52.6
CheckMental
71.2
73.2
CheckLive total57.1 vs 58.9+1.8
More match signals
BTTS 1H — Yes64%
Over 4.564%
Both teams to score — Yes62%
Today's market odds.
All both teams to score predictions →Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Musselburgh Athletic FC vs Clydebank FC?
On CheckLive metrics Clydebank FC rate higher: 58.9 vs 57.1, CheckLive signal strength 56/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards Musselburgh Athletic FC, so the edge is thin.
What is Clydebank FC's main edge?
Clydebank FC is strongest in recent form: CheckForm 58.7 vs 56.3 for Musselburgh Athletic FC. The overall rating gap is 1.8.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 3-2 (Musselburgh Athletic FC vs Clydebank FC, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |