| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 16 | 18 | 13 | 21 |
| 65 | 13 | 19 | 11 | 22 |
Catz Lappeenranta 68:65 Team Lem Kem — Match Result
Who won the Catz Lappeenranta vs Team Lem Kem game?
Catz Lappeenranta won 68-65.
What was the final score of Catz Lappeenranta vs Team Lem Kem?
Catz Lappeenranta 68 : 65 Team Lem Kem.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Catz Lappeenranta vs Team Lem Kem?
By quarter: 16:13, 18:19, 13:11, 21:22.
N. Aldanazar
61 - 53
2- 3
61 - 51
A. Pohjonen
- 3
58 - 51
A. Pohjonen
- 1
55 - 51
A. Pohjonen
- 1
54 - 51
A. Pohjonen
D. Jokinen
53 - 51
3- 2
53 - 48
D. Carloni
O. Pasanen
51 - 48
2- 2
51 - 46
T. Marttinen
L. Nevermann
49 - 46
3- 2
49 - 43
W. Vilén
- Matches0
- The most effective match0
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 0 |
Points | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |
No data
Statistics
69%
Free throws
69%
34%
2 pointers
38%
31%
3 pointers
23%
32%
Field goals
33%
47
Rebounds
50
30
Defensive rebounds
34
17
Offensive rebounds
16
16
Assists
9
25
Turnovers
26
18
Steals
13
1
Blocks
1
14
Fouls
17
8
Max points in a row
8
27:50
Time spent in lead
8:00
10
Biggest lead
7
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 16 | 15 | 1 | 93.8% | WWWW |
| 2 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | WWLL |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | LWLL |
| 4 | Turun Nkmy | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | WLWL |
| 5 | Torpan Pojat II | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | WWLL |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | LLLL |
| 7 | Tapiolan Honka II | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | WWLL |
| 8 | Leppavaaran Pyrinto | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56.3% | WLWL |
| 9 | Helsingin NMKY | 16 | 7 | 9 | 43.8% | LWWL |
| 10 | Huima | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | LLLW |
| 11 | Feeniks Basket | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | WWLL |
| 12 | Peli-Karhut II | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | LLLL |
| 13 | Team Lem Kem | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | WWWL |
| 14 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 16 | 5 | 11 | 31.3% | LWLW |
| 15 |  Hypo | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | LWWW |
| 16 |  Catz Lappeenranta | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% | WWWW |
| 17 | Salon Vilpas | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | LLLL |
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 21 | 18 | 3 | 85.7% | WWWW |
| 2 | Torpan Pojat II | 21 | 15 | 6 | 71.4% | WWLL |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 21 | 15 | 6 | 71.4% | LWLL |
| 4 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% | WWLL |
| 5 | Turun Nkmy | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% | WLWL |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% | LLLL |
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | LWLW |
| 2 | Team Lem Kem | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | WWWL |
| 3 | Hypo | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | LWWW |
| 4 | Catz Lappeenranta | 17 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | WWWW |
| 5 | Salon Vilpas | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | LLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 16 | +506 | 93.8% |
| 2 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 16 | +153 | 75.0% |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 16 | +164 | 75.0% |
| 4 | Turun Nkmy | 16 | +243 | 75.0% |
| 5 | Torpan Pojat II | 16 | +181 | 68.8% |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 16 | +115 | 68.8% |
| 7 | Tapiolan Honka II | 16 | +139 | 62.5% |
| 8 | Leppavaaran Pyrinto | 16 | +21 | 56.3% |
| 9 | Helsingin NMKY | 16 | +3 | 43.8% |
| 10 | Huima | 16 | -131 | 37.5% |
| 11 | Feeniks Basket | 16 | -112 | 37.5% |
| 12 | Peli-Karhut II | 16 | -62 | 37.5% |
| 13 | Team Lem Kem | 16 | -116 | 37.5% |
| 14 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 16 | -184 | 31.3% |
| 15 | Hypo | 16 | -309 | 25.0% |
| 16 | Catz Lappeenranta | 16 | -241 | 18.8% |
| 17 | Salon Vilpas | 16 | -370 | 6.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 21 | +581 | 85.7% |
| 2 | Torpan Pojat II | 21 | +210 | 71.4% |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 21 | +177 | 71.4% |
| 4 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 21 | +123 | 66.7% |
| 5 | Turun Nkmy | 21 | +251 | 66.7% |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 21 | +20 | 57.1% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 17 | -154 | 35.3% |
| 2 | Team Lem Kem | 17 | -119 | 35.3% |
| 3 | Hypo | 16 | -309 | 25.0% |
| 4 | Catz Lappeenranta | 17 | -238 | 23.5% |
| 5 | Salon Vilpas | 17 | -400 | 5.9% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tapiolan Honka II | 21 | +153 | 66.7% |
| 2 | Leppavaaran Pyrinto | 21 | +112 | 61.9% |
| 3 | Helsingin NMKY | 21 | +64 | 47.6% |
| 4 | Huima | 21 | -159 | 38.1% |
| 5 | Feeniks Basket | 21 | -147 | 38.1% |
| 6 | Peli-Karhut II | 21 | -165 | 28.6% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Team Lem Kem | 19 | -57 | 47.4% |
| 2 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 19 | -215 | 31.6% |
| 3 | Catz Lappeenranta | 19 | -204 | 31.6% |
| 4 | Hypo | 20 | -317 | 25.0% |
| 5 | Salon Vilpas | 19 | -427 | 5.3% |
Catz Lappeenranta
Team Lem Kem
Odds
| Bookmaker | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|