| Partido | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 16 | 18 | 13 | 21 |
| 65 | 13 | 19 | 11 | 22 |
Catz Lappeenranta 68:65 Team Lem Kem — Resultado del partido
¿Quién ganó el partido Catz Lappeenranta vs Team Lem Kem?
Catz Lappeenranta ganó 68-65.
¿Cómo terminó el partido Catz Lappeenranta vs Team Lem Kem?
Catz Lappeenranta 68 : 65 Team Lem Kem.
¿Cuál fue el marcador por cuartos de Catz Lappeenranta vs Team Lem Kem?
Por cuartos: 16:13, 18:19, 13:11, 21:22.
M. Jokinen
61 - 53
2- 3
61 - 51
A. Pohjonen
- 3
58 - 51
A. Pohjonen
- 1
55 - 51
A. Pohjonen
- 1
54 - 51
A. Pohjonen
D. Jokinen
53 - 51
3- 2
53 - 48
T. Hyvarinen
O. Pasanen
51 - 48
2- 2
51 - 46
T. Marttinen
I. Andersson
49 - 46
3- 2
49 - 43
W. Vilén
- Partidos0
- Partido con más goles0
/
/
- 0
Victorias
- 0
Victorias
| etiqueta | primer equipo | segundo equipo |
|---|---|---|
Victorias |  0 | 0 |
Puntos | 0 | 0 |
Media por partido | 0 | 0 |
Mayor victoria | 0 | 0 |
Sin datos
Estadísticas
69%
Tiros libres
69%
34%
2 puntos
38%
31%
3 puntos
23%
32%
Canastas de campo
33%
47
Rebotes
50
30
Rebotes defensivos
34
17
Rebotes ofensivos
16
16
Asistencias
9
25
Pérdidas de balón
26
18
Robos
13
1
Bloques
1
14
Faltas
17
8
Máximo de puntos consecutivos
8
27:50
Tiempo en ventaja
8:00
10
Ventaja máxima
7
| # | Equipo | PJ | G | P | % | Forma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 16 | 15 | 1 | 93.8% | GGGG |
| 2 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | GGPP |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | PGPP |
| 4 | Turun Nkmy | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75.0% | GPGP |
| 5 | Torpan Pojat II | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | GGPP |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | PPPP |
| 7 | Tapiolan Honka II | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | GGPP |
| 8 | Leppavaaran Pyrinto | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56.3% | GPGP |
| 9 | Helsingin NMKY | 16 | 7 | 9 | 43.8% | PGGP |
| 10 | Huima | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | PPPG |
| 11 | Feeniks Basket | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | GGPP |
| 12 | Peli-Karhut II | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | PPPP |
| 13 | Team Lem Kem | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% | GGGP |
| 14 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 16 | 5 | 11 | 31.3% | PGPG |
| 15 |  Hypo | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | PGGG |
| 16 |  Catz Lappeenranta | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% | GGGG |
| 17 | Salon Vilpas | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | PPPP |
| # | Equipo | PJ | G | P | % | Forma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 21 | 18 | 3 | 85.7% | GGGG |
| 2 | Torpan Pojat II | 21 | 15 | 6 | 71.4% | GGPP |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 21 | 15 | 6 | 71.4% | PGPP |
| 4 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% | GGPP |
| 5 | Turun Nkmy | 21 | 14 | 7 | 66.7% | GPGP |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% | PPPP |
| # | Equipo | PJ | G | P | % | Forma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | PGPG |
| 2 | Team Lem Kem | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | GGGP |
| 3 | Hypo | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | PGGG |
| 4 | Catz Lappeenranta | 17 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | GGGG |
| 5 | Salon Vilpas | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | PPPP |
| # | Equipo | PJ | DIF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 16 | +506 | 93.8% |
| 2 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 16 | +153 | 75.0% |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 16 | +164 | 75.0% |
| 4 | Turun Nkmy | 16 | +243 | 75.0% |
| 5 | Torpan Pojat II | 16 | +181 | 68.8% |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 16 | +115 | 68.8% |
| 7 | Tapiolan Honka II | 16 | +139 | 62.5% |
| 8 | Leppavaaran Pyrinto | 16 | +21 | 56.3% |
| 9 | Helsingin NMKY | 16 | +3 | 43.8% |
| 10 | Huima | 16 | -131 | 37.5% |
| 11 | Feeniks Basket | 16 | -112 | 37.5% |
| 12 | Peli-Karhut II | 16 | -62 | 37.5% |
| 13 | Team Lem Kem | 16 | -116 | 37.5% |
| 14 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 16 | -184 | 31.3% |
| 15 | Hypo | 16 | -309 | 25.0% |
| 16 | Catz Lappeenranta | 16 | -241 | 18.8% |
| 17 | Salon Vilpas | 16 | -370 | 6.3% |
| # | Equipo | PJ | DIF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espoo Basket Team II | 21 | +581 | 85.7% |
| 2 | Torpan Pojat II | 21 | +210 | 71.4% |
| 3 | Puhuttaret | 21 | +177 | 71.4% |
| 4 | Pyrinto Akatemia | 21 | +123 | 66.7% |
| 5 | Turun Nkmy | 21 | +251 | 66.7% |
| 6 | Pantterit (F) | 21 | +20 | 57.1% |
| # | Equipo | PJ | DIF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 17 | -154 | 35.3% |
| 2 | Team Lem Kem | 17 | -119 | 35.3% |
| 3 | Hypo | 16 | -309 | 25.0% |
| 4 | Catz Lappeenranta | 17 | -238 | 23.5% |
| 5 | Salon Vilpas | 17 | -400 | 5.9% |
| # | Equipo | PJ | DIF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tapiolan Honka II | 21 | +153 | 66.7% |
| 2 | Leppavaaran Pyrinto | 21 | +112 | 61.9% |
| 3 | Helsingin NMKY | 21 | +64 | 47.6% |
| 4 | Huima | 21 | -159 | 38.1% |
| 5 | Feeniks Basket | 21 | -147 | 38.1% |
| 6 | Peli-Karhut II | 21 | -165 | 28.6% |
| # | Equipo | PJ | DIF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Team Lem Kem | 19 | -57 | 47.4% |
| 2 | Jyvaskyla Basketball Academy | 19 | -215 | 31.6% |
| 3 | Catz Lappeenranta | 19 | -204 | 31.6% |
| 4 | Hypo | 20 | -317 | 25.0% |
| 5 | Salon Vilpas | 19 | -427 | 5.3% |
Catz Lappeenranta