Varhaug 1:3 Madla — Match Report
First half1 - 1
- 18M. Dessingué
- 43A. Ødegård
Second half0 - 2
- 53S. Skretting Sandtorv
- 87J. Antonio Halsne
Where people bet the most today
$978.3K
Betting volume16K
bets- Manchester City — Ipswich TownManchester City to win · 365 bets→$189.2K1,108 bets
- Everton — ChelseaChelsea to win · 492 bets→$133.5K1,101 bets
- Boca Juniors — TalleresLIVE · Boca Juniors to win · 183 bets→$109.8K1,723 bets
- Club Necaxa — AtlasLIVE · Atlas to win · 98 bets→$99.2K1,268 bets
- Real Betis — BarcelonaBarcelona to win · 592 bets→$96.2K1,306 bets
- Fulham — Hull CityFulham to win · 227 bets→$60.1K571 bets
- Espanyol — Atlético MadridAtlético Madrid to win · 281 bets→$30.2K530 bets
- Strasbourg — Paris Saint-GermainParis Saint-Germain to win · 136 bets→$30.1K321 bets
- Brentford — LiverpoolLiverpool to win · 179 bets→$22.2K445 bets
- Roma — GenoaRoma to win · 121 bets→$21.7K304 bets
Head to Head meetings
Varhaug – Madla
Varhaug
Madla
- 0
Victories
- 1
Draws
- 1
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 1  |
Scored goals | 2 | 4 |
Average per game | 1 | 2 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 1-3 |
Varhaug
Madla
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchThere is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Madla
Madla is a slight favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 58.8 vs 56.2 for Varhaug. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 71.2 vs 64.6). CheckLive signal strength 54/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards Varhaug, so the edge is thin.
Both teams to score — Yes
Medium confidence54%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
55.3
58.2
CheckSkill
53.2
53.8
CheckMental
64.6
71.2
CheckLive total56.2 vs 58.8+2.6
More match signals
Varhaug (DNB)58%
Varhaug or draw54%
Under 2.550%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Varhaug vs Madla?
On CheckLive metrics Madla rate higher: 58.8 vs 56.2, CheckLive signal strength 54/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards Varhaug, so the edge is thin.
What is Madla's main edge?
Madla is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 71.2 vs 64.6 for Varhaug. The overall rating gap is 2.6.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 2-1 (Varhaug vs Madla, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |