Fyllingsdalen 1:2 Gneist — Match Report
First half0 - 1
- 10M. Spinellis Wolff
Second half1 - 1
Where people bet the most today
$92.9K
Betting volume4.6K
bets- Brooklyn FC — Detroit City FCDouble chance: 1X · 402 bets→$22.4K779 bets
- Miami FC — Sporting JaxUnder 3.5 goals · 169 bets→$19.8K634 bets
- Atlético Nacional — Junior BarranquillaDouble chance: 12 · 73 bets→$9.8K425 bets
- Curaçao — Trinidad and TobagoUnder 2.5 goals · 289 bets→$9.6K654 bets
- Nyakrom Youth FC — Indy ElevenUnder 3.5 goals · 323 bets→$5.1K500 bets
- Paris Saint-Germain — Oud-Heverlee LeuvenDouble chance: 1X · 82 bets→$4.7K112 bets
- FC Tulsa — New Mexico UnitedDouble chance: X2 · 55 bets→$4.5K231 bets
- Dominica — GuyanaOver 0.5 goals · 158 bets→$4K342 bets
- Sacramento Republic FC — Las Vegas LightsLas Vegas Lights: over 0.5 goals · 25 bets→$3.4K242 bets
- US Virgin Islands — Saint MartinSaint Martin to win · 24 bets→$3.3K141 bets
Head to Head meetings
Fyllingsdalen – Gneist
Fyllingsdalen
Gneist
- 1
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 3
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  1 | 3  |
Scored goals | 6 | 8 |
Average per game | 1.5 | 2 |
The biggest victory | 3-1 | 1-3 |
Fyllingsdalen
Gneist
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchThere is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Fyllingsdalen
Fyllingsdalen is a slight favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 37 vs 36.8 for Gneist. The biggest edge is in overall quality (CheckSkill 44.7 vs 43.2). CheckLive signal strength 58/100.
Over 2.5
Medium confidence58%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
35.4
35.5
CheckSkill
44.7
43.2
CheckMental
22.4
24.4
CheckLive total37 vs 36.8+0.2
More match signals
Over 3.557%
Both teams to score — Yes56%
BTTS 1H — Yes53%
Today's market odds.
All both teams to score predictions →Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Fyllingsdalen vs Gneist?
On CheckLive metrics Fyllingsdalen rate higher: 37 vs 36.8, CheckLive signal strength 58/100.
What is Fyllingsdalen's main edge?
Fyllingsdalen is strongest in overall quality: CheckSkill 44.7 vs 43.2 for Gneist. The overall rating gap is 0.2.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 2-1 (Fyllingsdalen vs Gneist, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |