Fana 4:1 Fyllingsdalen — Match Report
First half2 - 1
- 2J. Lygre
- 8S. Hagen Gullaksen
- 29
- 40J. Lygre
Second half2 - 0
- 59J. Lygre
Standings
Fana – Fyllingsdalen
Where people bet the most today
$4.7M
Betting volume22.1K
bets- Brighton & Hove Albion — Crystal PalaceBrighton & Hove Albion to win · 617 bets→$2.5M1,562 bets
- Udinese — LecceLIVE · Lecce to win · 250 bets→$561.6K2,550 bets
- Nottingham Forest — ArsenalArsenal to win · 781 bets→$307.6K1,705 bets
- Bournemouth — SunderlandBournemouth to win · 174 bets→$163.2K939 bets
- Real Madrid — SevillaReal Madrid to win · 519 bets→$127.2K1,406 bets
- Leeds United — Manchester UnitedManchester United to win · 420 bets→$121.7K1,725 bets
- Västerås SK — Mjällby AIFLIVE · Under 2.5 goals · 5 bets→$101.9K282 bets
- Paris FC — Stade RennaisDouble chance: X2 · 173 bets→$94.4K537 bets
- Fiorentina — ComoComo to win · 171 bets→$73.6K535 bets
- Osasuna — Racing de SantanderLIVE · Osasuna to win · 80 bets→$72.3K942 bets
Head to Head meetings
Fana – Fyllingsdalen
Fana
Fyllingsdalen
- 4
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 1
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  4 | 1  |
Scored goals | 15 | 6 |
Average per game | 3 | 1.2 |
The biggest victory | 5-1 | 2-3 |
Fana
Fyllingsdalen
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchThere is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Clear favorite — Fana
Fana is a strong favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 59.2 vs 33.6 for Fyllingsdalen. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 73.2 vs 16). CheckLive signal strength 85/100.
Home win — Fana
High confidence85%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
59.5
33.5
CheckSkill
52.8
41.5
CheckMental
73.2
16
CheckLive total59.2 vs 33.6+25.6
More match signals
Fana (−1)91%
Fana (DNB)85%
Over 3.581%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Fana vs Fyllingsdalen?
On CheckLive metrics Fana rate higher: 59.2 vs 33.6, CheckLive signal strength 85/100.
What is Fana's main edge?
Fana is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 73.2 vs 16 for Fyllingsdalen. The overall rating gap is 25.6.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 3-1 (Fana vs Fyllingsdalen, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |