FC POHU/SiPa 0:2 Pitäjänmäen Tarmo — Match Report
Where people bet the most today
$372.7K
Betting volume8.4K
bets- Atlético Tucumán — Barracas CentralLIVE · Atlético Tucumán to win · 57 bets→$89K808 bets
- Cuiabá — Ponte PretaLIVE · Double chance: 1X · 45 bets→$45.3K604 bets
- Newell's Old Boys — LanúsLIVE · Draw · 55 bets→$32.8K516 bets
- Ireland — IsraelIreland to win · 199 bets→$31.2K444 bets
- Portugal — NorwayPortugal to win · 147 bets→$20.5K543 bets
- Sint Maarten — Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesLIVE · Double chance: 1X · 5 bets→$20K453 bets
- Deportes Tolima — Boyacá Chicó FCLIVE · Under 4.5 goals (1H) · 6 bets→$18.1K311 bets
- Netherlands — SerbiaNetherlands to win · 61 bets→$16.4K333 bets
- Greece — GermanyGermany to win · 218 bets→$14.8K429 bets
- Bahamas — US Virgin IslandsBahamas handicap +1.5 · 139 bets→$13.9K508 bets
Head to Head meetings
FC POHU/SiPa – Pitäjänmäen Tarmo
FC POHU/SiPa
Pitäjänmäen Tarmo
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 2
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 2 |
Scored goals | 1 | 5 |
Average per game | 0.5 | 2.5 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0-2 |
FC POHU/SiPa
Pitäjänmäen Tarmo
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchThere is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Pitäjänmäen Tarmo
Pitäjänmäen Tarmo is a slight favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 57.9 vs 54.9 for FC POHU/SiPa. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 69 vs 63.9). CheckLive signal strength 54/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards FC POHU/SiPa, so the edge is thin.
Both teams to score — Yes
Medium confidence54%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
55.3
57.4
CheckSkill
50.5
53.3
CheckMental
63.9
69
CheckLive total54.9 vs 57.9+3.0
More match signals
Over 3.558%
BTTS 1H — Yes54%
Over 4.551%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in FC POHU/SiPa vs Pitäjänmäen Tarmo?
On CheckLive metrics Pitäjänmäen Tarmo rate higher: 57.9 vs 54.9, CheckLive signal strength 54/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards FC POHU/SiPa, so the edge is thin.
What is Pitäjänmäen Tarmo's main edge?
Pitäjänmäen Tarmo is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 69 vs 63.9 for FC POHU/SiPa. The overall rating gap is 3.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 3-2 (FC POHU/SiPa vs Pitäjänmäen Tarmo, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |