UMF Tindastóll 4:4 UMF Víðir — Match Report
Standings
UMF Tindastóll – UMF Víðir
Where people bet the most today
$3.8M
Betting volume28.1K
bets- Paris Saint-Germain — BarcelonaBarcelona to win · 1,926 bets→$1.2M9,693 bets
- Napoli — Bodø/GlimtNapoli to win · 577 bets→$678.8K1,799 bets
- Manchester City — AEK AthensManchester City to win · 796 bets→$581.6K3,837 bets
- VfB Stuttgart — Atlético MadridAtlético Madrid to win · 1,143 bets→$469.6K2,197 bets
- Liverpool — VillarrealLiverpool to win · 1,106 bets→$361.8K2,696 bets
- Roma — ŠK Slovan BratislavaRoma to win · 353 bets→$153.6K1,733 bets
- FC Porto — PSV EindhovenFC Porto to win · 548 bets→$108.5K1,243 bets
- York City — Accrington StanleyYork City handicap -1.5 · 242 bets→$59.4K1,106 bets
- Bromley — Leicester CityOver 2.5 goals · 186 bets→$41.5K334 bets
- Luton Town — BarnsleyOver 3.5 goals · 46 bets→$23K250 bets
Head to Head meetings
UMF Tindastóll – UMF Víðir
UMF Tindastóll
UMF Víðir
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 1
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 1  |
Scored goals | 0 | 3 |
Average per game | 0 | 3 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0-3 |
UMF Tindastóll
UMF Víðir
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchThere is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — UMF Víðir
UMF Víðir is a slight favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 60.3 vs 59.6 for UMF Tindastóll. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 77.4 vs 73.2). CheckLive signal strength 57/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards UMF Tindastóll, so the edge is thin.
Both teams to score — Yes
Medium confidence57%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
59.5
59.7
CheckSkill
53.6
53.1
CheckMental
73.2
77.4
CheckLive total59.6 vs 60.3+0.7
More match signals
Over 2.558%
Over 3.551%
Home win — UMF Tindastóll50%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in UMF Tindastóll vs UMF Víðir?
On CheckLive metrics UMF Víðir rate higher: 60.3 vs 59.6, CheckLive signal strength 57/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards UMF Tindastóll, so the edge is thin.
What is UMF Víðir's main edge?
UMF Víðir is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 77.4 vs 73.2 for UMF Tindastóll. The overall rating gap is 0.7.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 3-2 (UMF Tindastóll vs UMF Víðir, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |