| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | 24 | 28 | 29 | 21 |
| 77 | 19 | 12 | 17 | 29 |
Ude Temuco 102:77 Cdb La Union — Match Result
Who won the Ude Temuco vs Cdb La Union game?
Ude Temuco won 102-77.
What was the final score of Ude Temuco vs Cdb La Union?
Ude Temuco 102 : 77 Cdb La Union.
Who scored the most points in Ude Temuco vs Cdb La Union?
Francisco A. Atala Fehlandt led all scorers with 25 points.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Ude Temuco vs Cdb La Union?
By quarter: 24:19, 28:12, 29:17, 21:29.
I. Stark
102 - 77
1I. Stark
102 - 76
3F. Adasme Crumacher
102 - 73
2S. Alesso Rodriguez
102 - 71
1S. Alesso Rodriguez
102 - 70
2- 3
102 - 68
D. Palma Menzel
- 1
99 - 68
C. Iglesias Toledo
- 1
98 - 68
C. Iglesias Toledo
S. Alesso Rodriguez
97 - 68
2- 2
97 - 66
C. Iglesias Toledo
- 1
95 - 66
C. Iglesias Toledo
- 1
94 - 66
C. Iglesias Toledo
I. Stark
93 - 66
2- 1
93 - 64
F. A. Atala Fehlandt
- 2
92 - 64
F. A. Atala Fehlandt
S. Alesso Rodriguez
90 - 64
1- 2
90 - 63
F. A. Atala Fehlandt
I. Stark
88 - 63
3- 1
88 - 60
C. Bobbitt II
- 2
87 - 60
F. A. Atala Fehlandt
S. Alesso Rodriguez
85 - 60
2S. Alesso Rodriguez
85 - 58
2S. Alesso Rodriguez
85 - 56
1S. Alesso Rodriguez
85 - 55
2- 1
85 - 53
N. Bessio
- 1
84 - 53
N. Bessio
- 1
83 - 53
C. Bobbitt II
- 1
82 - 53
C. Bobbitt II
F. Adasme Crumacher
81 - 53
2I. Stark
81 - 51
3
- Matches0
- The most effective match0
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 0 | 0 |
Points | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |
Statistics
61%
Free throws
66%
59%
2 pointers
52%
50%
3 pointers
11%
56%
Field goals
41%
19
Rebounds
19
15
Defensive rebounds
14
4
Offensive rebounds
5
10
Assists
4
9
Turnovers
14
10
Steals
7
2
Blocks
1
7
Fouls
13
12
Max points in a row
4
17:31
Time spent in lead
1:30
21
Biggest lead
4
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | WWWW | |
| 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | LWLL | |
| 3 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | WLWL | |
| 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | WWLW | |
| 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | LLLW | |
| 6 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | LLLW |
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | WWLL | |
| 3 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | LLLL | |
| 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | WWWL | |
| 5 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | WLLW | |
| 5 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | WWWL | |
| 6 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | LWWL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | +136 | 87.5% | |
| 2 | 8 | +13 | 62.5% | |
| 3 | 8 | +23 | 50.0% | |
| 4 | 8 | +15 | 50.0% | |
| 5 | 8 | -90 | 37.5% | |
| 6 | 8 | -97 | 12.5% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 9 | +74 | 66.7% | |
| 3 | 9 | +35 | 55.6% | |
| 4 | 8 | +38 | 55.6% | |
| 5 | 9 | -1 | 44.4% | |
| 5 | 8 | +48 | 62.5% | |
| 6 | 9 | -194 | 11.1% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | +135 | 87.5% | |
| 2 | 7 | +33 | 71.4% | |
| 3 | 8 | +15 | 50.0% | |
| 4 | 8 | +47 | 50.0% | |
| 5 | 7 | -24 | 42.9% | |
| 6 | 8 | -206 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | +61 | 71.4% | |
| 2 | 6 | +14 | 50.0% | |
| 3 | 6 | -4 | 50.0% | |
| 4 | 7 | -28 | 42.9% | |
| 5 | 6 | -43 | 33.3% |