| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 10 | 18 | 13 | 17 |
| 92 | 31 | 26 | 18 | 17 |
Tong Whye 58:92 IMG KStar — Match Result
Who won the Tong Whye vs IMG KStar game?
IMG KStar won 92-58.
What was the final score of Tong Whye vs IMG KStar?
Tong Whye 58 : 92 IMG KStar.
Who scored the most points in Tong Whye vs IMG KStar?
GM Edwardson Lucin Molino led all scorers with 21 points.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Tong Whye vs IMG KStar?
By quarter: 10:31, 18:26, 13:18, 17:17.
- 2
58 - 92
P. Ong
- 3
56 - 92
Z. Lee
X. Wei Zheng
53 - 92
2J. Jun Wei Tan
53 - 90
2G. Edwardson Lucin Molino
53 - 88
2Y. Soon Elvis Lim
53 - 86
2G. Edwardson Lucin Molino
53 - 84
2- 3
53 - 82
Z. Lee
G. Edwardson Lucin Molino
50 - 82
1- 2
50 - 81
A. Chua
- 2
48 - 81
A. Chua
Y. Soon Elvis Lim
46 - 81
2J. Jun Wei Tan
46 - 79
2C. Reyes Vincent Hao Yang
46 - 77
2- 2
46 - 75
A. Chua
- 3
44 - 75
J. Tan
Where people bet the most today
- Illawarra Hawks — Tasmania JackJumpersLIVE · Tasmania JackJumpers to win · 5 bets→$9.7K86 bets
- Las Vegas Aces — Golden State ValkyriesGolden State Valkyries to win · 90 bets→$3.1K131 bets
- Olympiacos BC — Anadolu EfesOlympiacos BC to win · 11 bets→$1.4K15 bets
- Sendai 89ers — Seahorses MikawaSendai 89ers to win · 19 bets→$80022 bets
- Sunrockers Shibuya — Toyama Grouses→$73530 bets
- Ibaraki Robots — Utstunomiya BrexUtstunomiya Brex to win · 11 bets→$60314 bets
- Cazoo Baskonia — Beşiktaş Icrypex→$47211 bets
- Barça Basket — Kauno ŽalgirisBarça Basket to win · 9 bets→$23515 bets
- Altiri Chiba — Osaka EvessaAltiri Chiba to win · 5 bets→$1477 bets
- Kyoto Hannaryz — Yokohama B CorsairsKyoto Hannaryz to win · 7 bets→$689 bets
No data
Statistics
30%
Free throws
50%
33%
2 pointers
50%
23%
3 pointers
22%
28%
Field goals
38%
49
Rebounds
74
41
Defensive rebounds
51
8
Offensive rebounds
23
17
Assists
19
18
Turnovers
12
7
Steals
11
1
Blocks
0
8
Fouls
8
9
Max points in a row
12
0:00
Time spent in lead
39:27
0
Biggest lead
39
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | WWWW | |
| 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | WLWL | |
| 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | LLWL | |
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | LWWW | |
| 5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WWLW | |
| 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | WWLW | |
| 7 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | WLLL | |
| 8 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | WLLL | |
| 9 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | LLLL | |
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LLW |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | +71 | 85.7% | |
| 2 | 7 | +54 | 71.4% | |
| 3 | 7 | -41 | 57.1% | |
| 4 | 7 | +21 | 57.1% | |
| 5 | 6 | -8 | 50.0% | |
| 6 | 5 | +60 | 80.0% | |
| 7 | 7 | -73 | 28.6% | |
| 8 | 6 | -29 | 16.7% | |
| 9 | 5 | -58 | 0.0% | |
| 10 | 3 | +3 | 33.3% |