TiPS Vantaa 0:2 TuPS — Match Report
First half0 - 1
- 44
Second half0 - 1
Where people bet the most today
$208.1K
Betting volume2.8K
bets- Náutico — NovorizontinoLIVE→$69K356 bets
- Borussia Dortmund — SV Werder BremenBorussia Dortmund to win · 169 bets→$68.4K654 bets
- Ceará — CriciúmaLIVE · Draw · 6 bets→$26.6K208 bets
- Palmeiras — BahiaPalmeiras to win · 128 bets→$21.7K515 bets
- Antigua GFC — CSD MunicipalDraw · 65 bets→$9.9K283 bets
- PSV Eindhoven — SC HeerenveenPSV Eindhoven to win · 24 bets→$4.7K239 bets
- Fortaleza CEIF — MillonariosMillonarios to win · 34 bets→$3K93 bets
- Instituto Córdoba — Boca JuniorsBoca Juniors to win · 13 bets→$1.6K105 bets
- Delfín — Mushuc RunaMushuc Runa: over 1.5 goals · 14 bets→$1.1K77 bets
- FC Volendam — VitesseVitesse: over 2.5 goals · 18 bets→$91876 bets
Head to Head meetings
TiPS Vantaa – TuPS

TiPS Vantaa

TuPS
- 4
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 1
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 4 | 1 |
Scored goals | 10 | 4 |
Average per game | 2 | 0.8 |
The biggest victory | 4-0 | 0-2 |

TiPS Vantaa

TuPS
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchOdds
| 1 | X | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.60 | 3.50 | 2.25 |
There is no enough info about formation in this moment. Checklive again later
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — TuPS
TuPS is a slight favourite on CheckLive metrics: overall rating 42.8 vs 40.9 for TiPS Vantaa. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 31.8 vs 28.6). CheckLive signal strength 55/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards TiPS Vantaa, so the edge is thin.
Over 2.5
Medium confidence55%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
38
38.3
CheckSkill
48.5
51.2
CheckMental
28.6
31.8
CheckLive total40.9 vs 42.8+1.9
More match signals
Home win — TiPS Vantaa50%2.60
Both teams to score — Yes57%
Over 3.551%
Today's market odds.
All both teams to score predictions →Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in TiPS Vantaa vs TuPS?
On CheckLive metrics TuPS rate higher: 42.8 vs 40.9, CheckLive signal strength 55/100. Home advantage tilts the CheckLive calculation towards TiPS Vantaa, so the edge is thin.
What is TuPS's main edge?
TuPS is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 31.8 vs 28.6 for TiPS Vantaa. The overall rating gap is 1.9.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 2-1 (TiPS Vantaa vs TuPS, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Head to Head meetings
/
/
- 0
Victories
- 0
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories | 0 | 0 |
Scored goals | 0 | 0 |
Average per game | 0 | 0 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |
Odds
| 1 | X | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.60 | 3.50 | 2.25 |

