ToU vs Pallo-Kerho 37
First half1 - 1
- 22E. Eze
- 27W. Kontinen
- 45H. HuttunenP. Laukkanen
- 45O. PaasonenS. Ruotsalainen
Second half0 - 1
- 57V. Toppinen
- 59T. LeskinenA. Tuppurainen
- 59W. JauhiainenL. Toppinen
- 59E. HyvärinenJ. Karhunen
- 61A. Ismail Sabir
- 65V. LahtoniemiW. Kontinen
- 65R. KoponenN. Adolfsson
- 78S. Kovalainen
- 81P. JänttiA. Ismail Sabir
- 81A. HiekkalaK. Ylivainio
- 87E. Eze
- 90T. Leskinen
- 90 + 1M. Daniel KermanA. Auvinen
Google AIAICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchH2H
Head to Head meetings
ToU – Pallo-Kerho 37
ToU
Pallo-Kerho 37
- 1
Victories
- 1
Draws
- 5
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  1 | 5  |
Scored goals | 5 | 16 |
Average per game | 0.71 | 2.29 |
The biggest victory | 2-1 | 0-4 |
Form
ToU
- 5Matches
- 6Goals
- 1.2Goal per game
- 0Wins
- 0Draws
- 5Losses
Pallo-Kerho 37
- 5Matches
- 9Goals
- 1.8Goal per game
- 4Wins
- 0Draws
- 1Losses
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — ToU
ToU is a slight favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 44.7 vs 40.8 for Pallo-Kerho 37. CheckLive signal strength 55/100.
Over 2.5
Low confidence58%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
36.7
37.6
CheckSkill
46.1
48.8
CheckMental
26.6
28.6
CheckLive total44.7 vs 40.8+3.9
More match signals
Both teams to score — Yes57%
Over 3.551%
Home win — ToU50%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in ToU vs Pallo-Kerho 37?
In the CheckLive calculation ToU is the favourite: 44.7 vs 40.8. Signal strength 55/100; it is not a win probability.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 3-2 (ToU vs Pallo-Kerho 37, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.