| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 | 26 | 23 | 19 | 16 |
| 67 | 12 | 24 | 11 | 20 |
Oleggio Junior Basket 84:67 Spatium Lettera 22 — Match Result
Questions & Answers
Who won the Oleggio Junior Basket vs Spatium Lettera 22 game?
Oleggio Junior Basket won 84-67.
What was the final score of Oleggio Junior Basket vs Spatium Lettera 22?
Oleggio Junior Basket 84 : 67 Spatium Lettera 22.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Oleggio Junior Basket vs Spatium Lettera 22?
By quarter: 26:12, 23:24, 19:11, 16:20.
Where people bet the most today
$3.3K
Betting volume81
bets- Alvark Tokyo — Nagasaki VelcaAlvark Tokyo to win · 11 bets→$1.1K17 bets
- South East Melbourne Phoenix — Illawarra HawksIllawarra Hawks to win · 7 bets→$96823 bets
- KK Partizan Mozzart Bet — Cazoo Baskonia→$6488 bets
- Levanga Hokkaido — San-en NeoPhoenixSan-en NeoPhoenix to win · 5 bets→$1765 bets
- Akita Northern Happinets — Ibaraki RobotsIbaraki Robots to win · 7 bets→$1727 bets
- Paris Basketball — Fenerbahçe BekoParis Basketball to win · 5 bets→$837 bets
- Parma Permsky Kray — UNICS KazanUNICS Kazan to win · 5 bets→$166 bets
Gruppo A 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | WWLW | |
| 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 3 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | LWLW | |
| 4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | WLWW | |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | LWWW | |
| 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | WLWW | |
| 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WWLW | |
| 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLLL | |
| 9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | WLWL | |
| 10 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LWLW | |
| 11 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LLWL | |
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | LLWL | |
| 13 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLLL | |
| 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | LWLL | |
| 15 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LWLL |
Gruppo B 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | WWWW | |
| 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | WWWL | |
| 4 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | WLWW | |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | LLWW | |
| 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLLL | |
| 7 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | WWLW | |
| 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LWWW | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LLWL | |
| 10 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LWLL | |
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | WLLL | |
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | LLLW | |
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | WLLL | |
| 14 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLWL | |
| 15 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | LLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | +121 | 85.7% | |
| 2 | 6 | +76 | 100.0% | |
| 3 | 7 | +78 | 71.4% | |
| 4 | 7 | +65 | 71.4% | |
| 5 | 6 | +51 | 66.7% | |
| 6 | 6 | -8 | 66.7% | |
| 7 | 6 | -8 | 50.0% | |
| 8 | 6 | -4 | 50.0% | |
| 9 | 7 | +35 | 42.9% | |
| 10 | 6 | +1 | 33.3% | |
| 11 | 6 | -7 | 33.3% | |
| 12 | 7 | -42 | 28.6% | |
| 13 | 6 | -71 | 16.7% | |
| 14 | 7 | -141 | 14.3% | |
| 15 | 6 | -146 | 16.7% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | +148 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 7 | +174 | 85.7% | |
| 3 | 7 | +70 | 85.7% | |
| 4 | 7 | +70 | 85.7% | |
| 5 | 6 | +54 | 66.7% | |
| 6 | 6 | +24 | 50.0% | |
| 7 | 7 | -12 | 42.9% | |
| 8 | 6 | -15 | 50.0% | |
| 9 | 6 | -61 | 50.0% | |
| 10 | 6 | -55 | 33.3% | |
| 11 | 7 | -66 | 28.6% | |
| 12 | 7 | -67 | 28.6% | |
| 13 | 7 | -85 | 14.3% | |
| 14 | 6 | -89 | 16.7% | |
| 15 | 6 | -90 | 0.0% |