| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 29 | 21 | 19 | 31 |
| 61 | 16 | 10 | 16 | 19 |
Appiano Gentile 100:61 Mitica Rovello — Match Result
Questions & Answers
Who won the Appiano Gentile vs Mitica Rovello game?
Appiano Gentile won 100-61.
What was the final score of Appiano Gentile vs Mitica Rovello?
Appiano Gentile 100 : 61 Mitica Rovello.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Appiano Gentile vs Mitica Rovello?
By quarter: 29:16, 21:10, 19:16, 31:19.
Where people bet the most today
$77.6K
Betting volume1.6K
bets- Detroit Pistons — Los Angeles LakersLos Angeles Lakers to win · 415 bets→$40.1K759 bets
- Chicago Bulls — Philadelphia 76ersPhiladelphia 76ers to win · 399 bets→$31.9K607 bets
- CSKA Moscow — Zenit St. PetersburgCSKA Moscow to win · 143 bets→$4K178 bets
- Saga Ballooners — Chiba Jets FunabashiLIVE · Chiba Jets Funabashi to win · 1 bet→$60416 bets
- Alvark Tokyo — San-en NeoPhoenixLIVE→$1708 bets
- Bahçeşehir Koleji — Yukatel Merkezefendi Belediyesi Basket→$1439 bets
- Anadolu Efes — Tofaş BursaTofaş Bursa to win · 5 bets→$959 bets
- Mitteldeutscher BC — Fraport Skyliners FrankfurtFraport Skyliners Frankfurt to win · 4 bets→$609 bets
- Pallacanestro Trieste — BC Roma Spqr→$175 bets
Group 1 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | WWWW | |
| 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | WWWL | |
| 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | LWWW | |
| 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | WLWW | |
| 7 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | WWLL | |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | LWWW | |
| 9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | LLWW | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLLL | |
| 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LLWW | |
| 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LLLW | |
| 13 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LWWW | |
| 14 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | WLLW | |
| 15 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LWLL | |
| 16 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLWL | |
| 17 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | WLLL | |
| 18 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | WLLL | |
| 19 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLLL | |
| 20 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | LLLL | |
| 21 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | LLLL |
Group 2 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | WWWW | |
| 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | LWLW | |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | WWWL | |
| 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | WLLW | |
| 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LWWW | |
| 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WLLW | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | LLWL | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | WWLL | |
| 11 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | WLLL | |
| 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LLWL | |
| 13 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLLW | |
| 14 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LLWL | |
| 15 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | LWLL | |
| 16 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | LLLL |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | +140 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 5 | +188 | 100.0% | |
| 3 | 6 | +101 | 83.3% | |
| 4 | 6 | +43 | 83.3% | |
| 5 | 5 | +59 | 80.0% | |
| 6 | 5 | +29 | 80.0% | |
| 7 | 6 | -10 | 66.7% | |
| 8 | 6 | -31 | 66.7% | |
| 9 | 5 | +9 | 60.0% | |
| 10 | 6 | +33 | 50.0% | |
| 11 | 6 | -7 | 50.0% | |
| 12 | 6 | +27 | 50.0% | |
| 13 | 6 | -24 | 50.0% | |
| 14 | 6 | -29 | 33.3% | |
| 15 | 6 | -32 | 33.3% | |
| 16 | 6 | -32 | 16.7% | |
| 17 | 5 | -44 | 20.0% | |
| 18 | 6 | -91 | 16.7% | |
| 19 | 6 | -106 | 16.7% | |
| 20 | 5 | -105 | 0.0% | |
| 21 | 6 | -118 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | +81 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 6 | +67 | 100.0% | |
| 3 | 6 | +53 | 83.3% | |
| 4 | 6 | +29 | 66.7% | |
| 5 | 6 | +6 | 66.7% | |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% | |
| 7 | 6 | +11 | 50.0% | |
| 8 | 6 | -3 | 50.0% | |
| 9 | 6 | +35 | 50.0% | |
| 10 | 6 | -1 | 50.0% | |
| 11 | 6 | +1 | 33.3% | |
| 12 | 6 | -50 | 33.3% | |
| 13 | 6 | -20 | 16.7% | |
| 14 | 6 | -44 | 16.7% | |
| 15 | 6 | -85 | 16.7% | |
| 16 | 6 | -80 | 0.0% |