Joonas Ahtinen scored the only goal MaPS Masku could muster as PIF held on to win 2-1 in the Kolmonen. A first half in which the hosts did their damage early proved decisive.
PIF vs MaPS
First half2 - 0
- 13S. Bajrami
- 23J. Lehtonen
- 35A. Hagelberg
- 39
- 45N. Petteri KuukasjarviM. Kyläheiko
- 45J. RaunioJ. Riikonen
Second half0 - 1
- 50E. Heimola
- 56J. Ahtinen
- 63A. Nieminen
- 67R. Atuse
- 67A. NordvallJ. Lehtonen
- 74S. Lehtinen
- 76P. HansellS. Lehtinen
- 81J. OksanenA. Nieminen
- 83V. Pllana
- 90 + 1S. Bajrami
Gary RedknappFootball AnalystMATCH REPORTQuestions & Answers
What was the final score of PIF vs MaPS Masku?
PIF 2-1 MaPS Masku (Kolmonen).
Who scored?
Sead Bajrami (13') for PIF; Kajus Svanberg (39') for PIF; Joonas Ahtinen (56') for MaPS Masku.
Were there any cards in PIF vs MaPS Masku?
Yellow cards: Joonas Lehtonen (MaPS Masku); Aleksi Hagelberg (MaPS Masku); Eemeli Heimola (MaPS Masku); Antti Nieminen (MaPS Masku); Samuel Lehtinen (PIF); Sead Bajrami (PIF).
Google AIAICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchH2H
Head to Head meetings
PIF – MaPS
PIF
MaPS
- 4
Victories
- 1
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  4 | 0  |
Scored goals | 10 | 3 |
Average per game | 2 | 0.6 |
The biggest victory | 2-0 | 0 |
Form
PIF
- 5Matches
- 9Goals
- 1.8Goal per game
- 2Wins
- 0Draws
- 3Losses
MaPS
- 5Matches
- 17Goals
- 3.4Goal per game
- 3Wins
- 0Draws
- 2Losses
Odds
| 1 | X | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53 | 4.33 | 4.33 |
◆ CheckLive verdict
Clear favorite — PIF
PIF is a strong favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 59.8 vs 43.3 for MaPS. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 58.4 vs 33.2). CheckLive signal strength 72/100.
Home win — PIF1.53
Medium confidence79%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
51.7
40.2
CheckSkill
53.8
50.1
CheckMental
58.4
33.2
CheckLive total59.8 vs 43.3+16.5
More match signals
PIF (DNB)78%
PIF (−1)76%
Under 2.569%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in PIF vs MaPS?
In the CheckLive calculation PIF is the favourite: 59.8 vs 43.3. Signal strength 72/100; it is not a win probability.
What is PIF's main edge?
PIF is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 58.4 vs 33.2 for MaPS. The overall rating gap is 16.5.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 3-1 (PIF vs MaPS, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
Odds
| 1 | X | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53 | 4.33 | 4.33 |