Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 vs KoPa
First half2 - 0
- 25P. Haapalainen
- 37P. Haapalainen
- 45R. SeppO. Hämäläinen
- 45L. KivistöP. Haapalainen
- 45A. ÅhmanH. Kangaskorpi
- 45J. Plonski
Second half3 - 0
- 48L. Kivistö
- 63M. NieminenL. Heschung
- 67J. Bagge
- 67
- 67M. PäivinenE. Segerman
- 77V. KnaappilaP. Kosonen
- 82
Google AIAICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchH2H
Head to Head meetings
Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 – KoPa
Mikkelin Palloilijat 2
KoPa
- 1
Victories
- 1
Draws
- 1
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  1 | 1  |
Scored goals | 5 | 1 |
Average per game | 1.67 | 0.33 |
The biggest victory | 5-0 | 0-1 |
Form
Mikkelin Palloilijat 2
- 5Matches
- 12Goals
- 2.4Goal per game
- 2Wins
- 0Draws
- 3Losses
KoPa
- 5Matches
- 8Goals
- 1.6Goal per game
- 2Wins
- 1Draws
- 2Losses
◆ CheckLive verdict
Slight edge — Mikkelin Palloilijat 2
Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 is the favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 48.6 vs 42.4 for KoPa. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 33.2 vs 30.8). CheckLive signal strength 59/100.
Under 2.5
Medium confidence63%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
40.6
38.5
CheckSkill
48.8
50.6
CheckMental
33.2
30.8
CheckLive total48.6 vs 42.4+6.2
More match signals
Under 1.559%
Both teams to score — No57%
Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 or draw54%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 vs KoPa?
In the CheckLive calculation Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 is the favourite: 48.6 vs 42.4. Signal strength 59/100; it is not a win probability.
What is Mikkelin Palloilijat 2's main edge?
Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 33.2 vs 30.8 for KoPa. The overall rating gap is 6.2.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 2-0 (Mikkelin Palloilijat 2 vs KoPa, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.