SaPa Pieksämäki vs Komeetat
First half0 - 1
- 37J. Myllyntaus
- 45M. OrbinskiT. Laukkanen
Second half1 - 0
- 52A. Tanskanen
- 59L. VanhalaT. Poikkimäki
- 59J. ReinaN. Paukkunen
- 63S. Liimatainen
- 68V. SavolainenS. Heinonen
- 83N. LeppänenL. Vanhala
- 84D. HynninenA. Tanskanen
- 89M. KuronenJ. Myllyntaus
AICheckLive AI Bot
Model verdict, form, head-to-head and live pressure for this match. Ask anything in Telegram.
Ask the AI bot about this matchH2H
Head to Head meetings
SaPa Pieksämäki – Komeetat
SaPa Pieksämäki
Komeetat
- 0
Victories
- 1
Draws
- 0
Victories
| label | first team | second team |
|---|---|---|
Victories |  0 | 0  |
Scored goals | 1 | 1 |
Average per game | 1 | 1 |
The biggest victory | 0 | 0 |
Form
SaPa Pieksämäki
- 5Matches
- 7Goals
- 1.4Goal per game
- 0Wins
- 1Draws
- 4Losses
Komeetat
- 5Matches
- 9Goals
- 1.8Goal per game
- 1Wins
- 1Draws
- 3Losses
◆ CheckLive verdict
Clear favorite — SaPa Pieksämäki
SaPa Pieksämäki is a strong favourite in the CheckLive calculation: 60 + 5.8 for home advantage = 65.8 vs 38.8 for Komeetat. The biggest edge is in mental resilience (CheckMental 75.4 vs 26.6). CheckLive signal strength 82/100.
Home win — SaPa Pieksämäki
High confidence81%
Three CheckLive metrics
CheckForm
60.4
36.3
CheckSkill
52.9
46.1
CheckMental
75.4
26.6
CheckLive total65.8 vs 38.8+27.0
More match signals
SaPa Pieksämäki (−1)86%
Over 3.581%
SaPa Pieksämäki (DNB)80%
Today's market odds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the favourite in SaPa Pieksämäki vs Komeetat?
In the CheckLive calculation SaPa Pieksämäki is the favourite: 60 + 5.8 for home advantage = 65.8 vs 38.8. Signal strength 82/100; it is not a win probability.
What is SaPa Pieksämäki's main edge?
SaPa Pieksämäki is strongest in mental resilience: CheckMental 75.4 vs 26.6 for Komeetat. The overall rating gap is 27.
How does CheckLive rate the match?
The rating is built on three metrics: form (CheckForm), quality (CheckSkill) and mentality (CheckMental). Their values and the match signals are below.
What does Confidence mean?
Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.
What is the correct-score prediction?
CheckLive calculation: 3-1 (SaPa Pieksämäki vs Komeetat, regulation time). Confidence describes model signal strength, not the probability of a win or an exact score.