| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | 11 | 14 | 4 | 5 |
| 104 | 30 | 27 | 24 | 23 |
Zagreb U18 34:104 Cedevita Junior U18 — Match Result
Questions & Answers
Who won the Zagreb U18 vs Cedevita Junior U18 game?
Cedevita Junior U18 won 104-34.
What was the final score of Zagreb U18 vs Cedevita Junior U18?
Zagreb U18 34 : 104 Cedevita Junior U18.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Zagreb U18 vs Cedevita Junior U18?
By quarter: 11:30, 14:27, 4:24, 5:23.
Where people bet the most today
$3.6K
Betting volume139
bets- Fenerbahçe Beko — Kauno ŽalgirisFenerbahçe Beko to win · 23 bets→$1.6K45 bets
- LDLC ASVEL Lyon-Villeurbanne — KK Crvena zvezda MeridianbetLDLC ASVEL Lyon-Villeurbanne to win · 9 bets→$74314 bets
- Valencia Basket — Olympiacos BCOlympiacos BC to win · 11 bets→$43917 bets
- EA7 Emporio Armani Milano — Real MadridEA7 Emporio Armani Milano to win · 11 bets→$31119 bets
- KK Partizan Mozzart Bet — Panathinaikos BCKK Partizan Mozzart Bet to win · 14 bets→$17724 bets
- Barça Basket — Maccabi Tel AvivMaccabi Tel Aviv to win · 13 bets→$14716 bets
No data
Statistics
5
Free throws
10
7
2 pointers
41
5
3 pointers
4
12
Field goals
45
1. Juniorska Liga U18 (M) 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WW | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WWWL | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LW | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WWLW | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | WLLW | |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LLWL | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | W | |
| 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | WWLL | |
| 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LWLL | |
| 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | WWLL |
1. Juniorska Liga U18, Kvalifikacije - Doigravanje 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | WWLL | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | LWLW | |
| 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | LLLL |
Kvalifikacije - Skupina A 26/27
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWL | |
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LLWL | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | WWLL | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | LLW |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | +58 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 2 | +52 | 100.0% | |
| 3 | 2 | +8 | 50.0% | |
| 4 | 2 | +6 | 50.0% | |
| 5 | 2 | -3 | 50.0% | |
| 6 | 2 | -11 | 50.0% | |
| 7 | 2 | -38 | 50.0% | |
| 8 | 1 | +70 | 100.0% | |
| 9 | 1 | +3 | 100.0% | |
| 10 | 2 | -30 | 0.0% | |
| 11 | 2 | -34 | 0.0% | |
| 12 | 2 | -81 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | +25 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 2 | -8 | 50.0% | |
| 3 | 2 | -17 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | +147 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 3 | -38 | 33.3% | |
| 3 | 3 | -53 | 33.3% | |
| 4 | 3 | -56 | 33.3% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | +107 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 3 | +15 | 66.7% | |
| 3 | 3 | -52 | 33.3% | |
| 4 | 3 | -70 | 0.0% |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | +101 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 2 | -23 | 50.0% | |
| 3 | 2 | -78 | 0.0% |