| Game | 1q | 2q | 3q | 4q |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | 19 | 31 | 23 | 17 |
| 56 | 9 | 8 | 14 | 25 |
Botafogo +35 90:56 SC Mackenzie +35 — Match Result
Who won the Botafogo +35 vs SC Mackenzie +35 game?
Botafogo +35 won 90-56.
What was the final score of Botafogo +35 vs SC Mackenzie +35?
Botafogo +35 90 : 56 SC Mackenzie +35.
Who scored the most points in Botafogo +35 vs SC Mackenzie +35?
Gutemberg Pereira de Souza led all scorers with 18 points.
What was the quarter-by-quarter score of Botafogo +35 vs SC Mackenzie +35?
By quarter: 19:9, 31:8, 23:14, 17:25.
- 2
82 - 41
P. Henrique Tojal de Lima da Silva
- 3
80 - 41
G. Pereira de Souza
R. Ricardo da Silva
77 - 41
3- 3
77 - 38
G. Pereira de Souza
R. Ricardo da Silva
74 - 38
2R. Guagliardi Silva
74 - 36
3D. de Almeida Lyra Correa
74 - 33
2- 1
74 - 31
V. Araujo Cabral da Silva
Where people bet the most today
- Perth Wildcats — New Zealand BreakersPerth Wildcats to win · 6 bets→$69212 bets
- Nishinomiya Storks — Osaka EvessaOsaka Evessa to win · 22 bets→$63537 bets
- RETABet Bilbao Basket — BAXI ManresaRETABet Bilbao Basket to win · 8 bets→$4588 bets
- Shinshu Brave Warriors — Toyama GrousesToyama Grouses to win · 15 bets→$36327 bets
- Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt — Rasta VechtaFraport Skyliners Frankfurt to win · 11 bets→$33611 bets
- Barça Basket — Leyma Basquet CoruñaBarça Basket to win · 15 bets→$31320 bets
- MoraBanc Andorra — Monbus ObradoiroHandicap MoraBanc Andorra (-8.5) · 5 bets→$1105 bets
- Sendai 89ers — Akita Northern HappinetsAkita Northern Happinets to win · 13 bets→$9014 bets
No data
Statistics
87%
Free throws
40%
59%
2 pointers
25%
30%
3 pointers
7%
48%
Field goals
18%
40
Rebounds
22
33
Defensive rebounds
19
7
Offensive rebounds
3
22
Assists
5
6
Turnovers
12
5
Steals
3
1
Blocks
0
12
Fouls
4
10
Max points in a row
4
24:26
Time spent in lead
0:00
42
Biggest lead
0
| # | Team | P | W | L | % | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWW | |
| 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | WWLL | |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | WWWL | |
| 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | WLLL | |
| 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | LLLD | |
| 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | LDLL | |
| 7 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | LLLL | |
| 8 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | LWWW | |
| 9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | LWWL | |
| 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | WLWL | |
| 11 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | LLWW |
| # | Team | P | DIFF | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | +188 | 100.0% | |
| 2 | 7 | +63 | 71.4% | |
| 3 | 5 | +129 | 100.0% | |
| 4 | 5 | +14 | 60.0% | |
| 5 | 6 | -37 | 33.3% | |
| 6 | 5 | -1 | 60.0% | |
| 7 | 7 | -163 | 14.3% | |
| 8 | 5 | -18 | 40.0% | |
| 9 | 5 | -7 | 40.0% | |
| 10 | 5 | -1 | 40.0% | |
| 11 | 6 | -167 | 0.0% |